I highly recommend showing the comparison between Jordan's description of Michael and the autopsy results, as it CLEARLY proves that Jordan was wrong about circumcision, as he specifically stated in his description that Michael was circumcised, and his autopsy clearly states he wasn't. FAIL
I'd also recommend pointing out the demeanor of Sneddon, especially when Michael first got arrested. He was making jokes about Michael, calling him wacko J****, acting like Michael was already guilty ('we got him!'). That man was putting it into peoples heads from the start that Michael was guilty, so we'd all think he was, and Michael would have more chance of being destroyed. How he was allowed to get away with that is beyond me.
Also there is Aphrodite Jones' book, which was written from court transcripts and documents. Other people tried to write books about the trial but the judge wouldn't allow it because they were trying to make Michael look guilty. Aphrodite WAS allowed to write her book because she was telling the truth. The problem was that because she was writing in favour of Michael, no book company would sign her, whereas jurors who wanted to write books with the opposite theme had book deals before the trial was even over.
Then there is the money. Everyone's argument seems to be 'well if Michael is so innocent why did he give them money?'. Well if Michael is so guilty, why did they take it? They allowed this man to get away with what Michael apparently did, in turn allowing more people to be molested, and even then they refused to testify against him.
And for the record, it was not actually MICHAEL who paid them off, he wanted to fight the charges. It was his solicitors (?). They could have had their cake and eaten it too. They had years to reopen the case, even AFTER they'd been paid. They could have had him locked up and then sued him $20 million on psychological damages, or earned it through interviews and book deals, while at the same time making sure a paedophile is locked away for good. But no.
Evan Chandler tried suing Michael $60 million, 3 times the original payment settlement, because he 'breached the gag order'. That was in court for years. The allegations never even WENT to court. Why? Because they got money. They were happy to take the money, and then sue for more money, but not get this man locked away for a horrific crime. One of the Chandlers even wrote the book All That Glitters, about the apparent relationship Michael and Jordan had. Why write a book about it? If you have THAT MUCH evidence, if you are THAT determined to show his guilt, newsflash- take him to court and have him locked up where he belongs.
The FBI files released showed that nothing was ever found against Michael. There were 2 PDs and the FBI after Michael for years, and they found nothing. No DNA evidence, no video evidence, no confessions, no child porn, nothing. The only hard 'evidence' they found was Gavin's fingerprints on a pornography magazine. That was proven to be falsified evidence, due to the fact that the date on the magazine (August 2003) completely contradicted the story of what apparently happened as according to what they testified, they were long gone from Michael's home before August that year. Then during cross examination it was found that the magazine had been tested AFTER Gavin had to opportunity to handle it during the initial investigation.
There is also of course the matter of prosecution witnesses being paid to testify, and a lot of witnesses- including Martin Bashir and ex-employees- who went to the MEDIA before they ever went to the police about what they apparently knew. Some of those employees testified they had SEEN Michael molest children. And they did NOTHING? Give me a break. Even Bashit only testified because he was forced to do so. And didn't he make an apology to the Jackson's after Michael died? Why would he do that if he REALLY thought Michael was guilty?
Anyway, I could go on and on and on, and I am only repeating myself. But I hope there is some info you can get from that.
