[quote name="Teva"]
@ Annelise,
You say you can't get past the 1993 case and that is quite understandable. None of us know for sure what happened. That's why we have trials, and a beautiful thing called cross examination.
I always flip flop when it comes to this case for the simple reason I mentioned above. However, history hates mysteries, and take heart that this will be solved. Jordan is 30 now, and one day he may have a child, and that could force him out in public to speak about what happened. Also someone will get to the bottom of the sodium amytal mystery. When the judge allowed previous testimony from the 1993 case into the 2005 that caused Messereau to investigate that allegation. Even if the things I read make Michael look guilty I still cannot shake, "what does Messereau know that I don't feeling." He would have had to prepare a cross examination for Jordan had he showed up, and why feverently defend MJ even after death, to me that doesn't make sense. So much has been written about this case, yet so much is unknown.
[/quote]
I think, you should remember it was just an allegation. The psychiatric interview is very dramatic but all false allegations have these kind of psychiatric interview because the parents are behind them . You just never read them. I think Mesereau knows probably much more about false allegation than we do.
In France, a few years ago we had the Outreau case. Kids all said they were raped and tortured by 15 adults. There stories were found credible by psychiatrist and their interviews were very dramatic but all the kids were lying.