hopespringseternal said:
You know this is beyond disappointing to me
but the biggest thing that people continue to hold on to is the 1993 Chandler accusations to justify calling Michael a pedophile. I have successfully been able to argue to people the falsehoods and lies with the Arviso’s and Francia’s but because the Chandler allegations were never litigated at trial along with Jordan Chandler never testifying under oath, people hold on to those allegations. Those allegations were the most vulgar, salacious, disturbing and horribly vile ones levied against Michael and since it started with Jordan the only way that Michael can be totally exonerated is Jordan telling the truth. Sadly I don’t ever seeing that happening since he is rich off of ill gotten wealth.
Well said.
Do you know how emptiness feels? That is how I feel about this tired issue. I cant even get angry anymore because it is so worthless. When you read, see and encounter the same bullshit time and time again, you just dont have any energy left to even feel upset anymore.
These people sound like a broken record, and when things get unbearably repetitive, it somehow doesnt even bother you sometimes. Now all I can do is laugh. Its everything we've all heard before, just rewritten in different ways. To this day, I still defend Michael wholeheartedly whenever I can, but I dont feel that same fury I used to feel maybe 5 years ago, when I was a new fan.
Now, its so old, its like, if you want to call him "Wacko Jacko", a child molester and God know's what else -- the joke is on you. The newscaster from a respected News channel refers to Michael Jackson as "Jacko" in the news report, and wants me to take them seriously? Does it take so much out of one to write "s" and "n" when they write an article? Is it too much to ask to use someone's goverment name? I mean really. They are the joke, not Michael. They need to just get over it, and fully accept that they keep a MJ shrine in the back of their closets