BillieJeanLover
New member
I agree with you HotMJ. And we know the media bashing is alive, well and kicking, and has been for a long time.
This jury is not sequential, so they are free to watch the TV. Are they not? That is why it is paramount that we pray that some of them will be able to see through all of the nonsense and sea of biased haze that is being put out there by some in the media. Hopefully, some of them, and preferably all of them, will see the evidence presented in the prosecution case for what it was, is and was not. It stinks, and it is not believable, which translates to one being doubtful of it, and especially when they witnessed how Mez tore apart near bout every prosecution witness' testimony.
Those in the jury are just like we are, for the most part. They've heard what we've heard, and then some. I can't believe that they don't already know how they feel about what the prosecution conveyed or tried to convey to them. What would be the point of them listening to the DA if they weren't going to try to understand in their own minds if they believed what was presented to them?
Half of their battle is over. They now have to hear the defense side, and then add, deduct, credit or discredit what they've heard or will hear.
Some in the media are trying to infuence them, because they know the jury is not sequentialed. Again, hopefully, they will be able to weed out all of the BS and reach a fair decision, and especially after they hear the defense evidence. But no one can convince me that they haven't already surmised what they've heard from the DA, and that has to do with whether they believe none, some, most or all of the DA evidence.
Remember, if we can see through all the mess the prosecution tried to spew, why can't they? After all, they are in the living room of the court where the real evidence is being presented.
Hello Carla. Thanks for that.
This jury is not sequential, so they are free to watch the TV. Are they not? That is why it is paramount that we pray that some of them will be able to see through all of the nonsense and sea of biased haze that is being put out there by some in the media. Hopefully, some of them, and preferably all of them, will see the evidence presented in the prosecution case for what it was, is and was not. It stinks, and it is not believable, which translates to one being doubtful of it, and especially when they witnessed how Mez tore apart near bout every prosecution witness' testimony.
Those in the jury are just like we are, for the most part. They've heard what we've heard, and then some. I can't believe that they don't already know how they feel about what the prosecution conveyed or tried to convey to them. What would be the point of them listening to the DA if they weren't going to try to understand in their own minds if they believed what was presented to them?
Half of their battle is over. They now have to hear the defense side, and then add, deduct, credit or discredit what they've heard or will hear.
Some in the media are trying to infuence them, because they know the jury is not sequentialed. Again, hopefully, they will be able to weed out all of the BS and reach a fair decision, and especially after they hear the defense evidence. But no one can convince me that they haven't already surmised what they've heard from the DA, and that has to do with whether they believe none, some, most or all of the DA evidence.
Remember, if we can see through all the mess the prosecution tried to spew, why can't they? After all, they are in the living room of the court where the real evidence is being presented.
Hello Carla. Thanks for that.