MystiqueX2004
New member
Originally posted by MyAngelMJ
I can't understand this Judge Melville.. Angel Vivanco's testimony seemed real important to prove that gavin's mother and her husband are planning 'something big' on Michael.
God, why didn' t Melville allow this???? He allowed all rubbish for the prosecutors previously..
That is what I am thinking....This guy was crucial not only on the part of what he heard but because he also supposedly saw the accuser and his brother with porn magazines before February 2003....I don't understand why his testimony would not be allowed...:idontknow
Correction: I heard that he was allowed to testify just not about the "something big" part