Cristine87
New member
I don't know why but the idea of the defense resting their case makes me nervous! I guess because, even though I know the evidence is in Michael's favor, the verdict day still makes me nervous!
Originally posted by Cristine87
I don't know why but the idea of the defense resting their case makes me nervous! I guess because, even though I know the evidence is in Michael's favor, the verdict day still makes me nervous!
Originally posted by MJ'sWife#3
From MJNO:
Jackson trial update:
5. Rumor...not fact, that Jackson has been receiving coaching in preparation to take the stand. Raymone Bain denies this. Again "rumor" on Court TV ...Catherine Crier.
Originally posted by Colin
If theres any truth to MJ not doing anything about it when he knew the kids had stolen wine, its probably cos when he's around kids he doesnt want to be the authority figure. he wants to be one of the kids, thats the whole point. so hes not gonna tell them off.
thats my theoryanyway, which is probably wrong and also probably based on something that didnt even happen, because DD said it!
Originally posted by MJ'sWife#3
More motions passed:
1. No JC Penny witnesses to come in
2. No Mary Minnow ( this is a book expert that would have proven Jackson's reason's for having those "art books" and why, they were a good investment.)
Possibility: Now prosecution cannot bring in Ken langing (sp) wrong sorry...the expert who was going to discuss the opposite of why Jackson had these "art books."
The judge's new excuse is that he doesn't want to "retry" the J.C. Penny case.Originally posted by maintenant
They can skip the art books, the jury sees through that and doesn't worry about them in the least.
But no J.C. Penney witnesses, I don't like that. Does the jury already know about the J.C. Penney story? I hope so, it's very important in impeaching the Arviso testimony.
That's a very good point--he's not to become the big "disciplinarian", Neverland is supposed to be a fun place, not lots of rules and restrictions.Originally posted by maintenant+-->QUOTE (maintenant)
<!--QuoteBegin-Colin
If theres any truth to MJ not doing anything about it when he knew the kids had stolen wine, its probably cos when he's around kids he doesnt want to be the authority figure. he wants to be one of the kids, thats the whole point. so hes not gonna tell them off.
thats my theoryanyway, which is probably wrong and also probably based on something that didnt even happen, because DD said it!
I'm sure a good parent would downplay any suspicions, ill will etc. they might have felt toward these kids in front of young Rijo. No point in upsetting Rijo by raising hell then and there with Gavin and Star about the porn etc. The kids were house guests and somebody else's children. The wine was no longer in their hands, so better for Mike to stay and comfort Rijo. Nicer too.Originally posted by MerlinX@ May 18 2005, 10:38 AM @ MJJForum.com
Perhaps Michael just wasn't in the mood to get up and to go to the guest unit. Perhaps he was too lazy at this tame and so he said he does'nt belive Rio.
But the if the jurors believe that Michael didn't believe Rio it tells us that it was a ridiculous idea that Michael showed Gavin porn movies hor mags.
And it is getting obvious that some media lie about important things because they dont want Michael to be totally vindicated. The stronger the defense is and it is very strong, the harder they try to lie and to manipulate the readers or viewers!
Originally posted by SpecialJanet25
I wonder where the hell that rumor starting about the defense resting their case son soon? Anyway, thank to Raymone (my homegirl ) for that information.
The judge's new excuse is that he doesn't want to "retry" the J.C. Penny case.
Yeah right. So why are we "retrying" '93?
Both "cases" were never tried to begin with, because both were settled out of court.
Penny's SHOULD have come in. It impeaches the D.A.'s lead witness re the conspiracy charge in the current case actually being tried!
Yet ANOTHER appeal issue, as if another was needed!
"He didn't believe it," Rio Jackson said of his famous first cousin. "He thought they were good."
If you remember, Gavin Arvizo was specifically asked on the stand by Mesereau under cross-examination if anyone had ever walked in on him masturbating. He categorically denied it. Well, now the public knows that he wasn't telling the truth before the jury.