Photos may contradict Michael's accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

[whisperAdmin]

Photos may contradict Michael's accuser
USA TODAY (pre-1997 Fulltext). McLean, Va.: Jan 28, 1994. pg. 02.D

Section: LIFE
ISSN/ISBN: 07347456
Text Word Count 106


Abstract:
The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

Full Text:
Copyright USA Today Information Network Jan 28, 1994

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

If so, this could weaken any possible criminal actions against the singer. Already, speculation that the 14-year-old boy may not be willing to cooperate with officials is swirling.

The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

Lawyers for both sides could not be reached for comment Thursday.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/USAToday/55226686.html?did=55226686&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&desc=Photos+may+contradict+Michael%27s+accuser

 

[2Dangerous4MJ]

YEA-UH! That liar.

 

[dangerous]

MAY contradict? HAHHAHA. They absolutley 100% undoubtedly contradicted!!!! They dont need JC to testify if the kid can depict MJ's wee wee. Morons. nesided:

 

[MJ_FAN_FOR_LIFE733]

Originally posted by whisper
Photos may contradict Michael's accuser
USA TODAY (pre-1997 Fulltext). McLean, Va.: Jan 28, 1994. pg. 02.D

Section: LIFE
ISSN/ISBN: 07347456
Text Word Count 106


Abstract:
The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

Full Text:
Copyright USA Today Information Network Jan 28, 1994

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

If so, this could weaken any possible criminal actions against the singer. Already, speculation that the 14-year-old boy may not be willing to cooperate with officials is swirling.

The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

That bastard! He can burn in hell for all I care!!!!!!!!

~Kelly M. Abbott~

 

[frozen rose]

well at least we got some good news out of it:

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

this is great news.

 

[hot4uMichael]

thanks for posting.... of course nothing can be said because there are no evidence on that Michael did this... only his porno magazine but those are printed long after the family left neverland for good.... god

 

[DirtyDiana87]

Thanks Whisper.

Heather~

 

[Dialdancer]

Copyright USA Today Information Network Jan 28, 1994

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

If so, this could weaken any possible criminal actions against the singer. Already, speculation that the 14-year-old boy may not be willing to cooperate with officials is swirling.

It is too bad the Media could find those balls they pretended to own and report this right.

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!........Jackson accuser could not identify Jackson as previously reported by the SB DA's Office. Jackson's young accuser was way off the mark, his drawing and the photos prove he could not have seen the entertainer in any state of undress. And what of the civil suit and Jackson's claim of extortion? Will there be a criminal investigation of the father who reported the alleged molestation, but who refuses to cooperate with Police in their molestation investigation?

​