Official June 3 2005

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

Locked
sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by sistahlamb » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:40 pm

Will the pros. do a rebuttal???

I can't imagine them having much to say if they do.

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by sistahlamb » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:41 pm

avigailamor at mjjf:

When Mez talked about how the jury would be helping the family get rich and how they shouldn't let them get away with it, one of the jurors were nodding in agreement.

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official June 3 2005

Post by whisper » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:42 pm

Originally posted by sistahlamb
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mjjf:
DirtyDiana2000: (Diane Dimond) She said that the jury requested a time extension to deliberate because they feel they could reach a verdict today, it was GRANTED! So the extension is for a few hours until like 5pm to 5:30 pacific. Michael has to stay in the area until then. This is coming from fans who were in court.

Just more on the extra time the jury are getting today.
This has yet to be independently confirmed as of now.

Frenchy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:31 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by Frenchy » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:43 pm

Originally posted by sistahlamb
(Diane Dimond) She said that the jury requested a time extension to deliberate because they feel they could reach a verdict today, it was GRANTED!
WOW!!! I think that's a very good sign!!!
I have said it before, since a verdict of guilty of all charges is not possible, basically, it's either a hung jury or not guilty of all charges. Hung jury means that the jurors don't manage to agree, but they must try to agree, and that would take a LOT of time. So if they think that it's going to be quick, that's probably because they all agree, or almost -- which means that this is a good sign! OMG, I have goose bumps!

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by sistahlamb » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:47 pm

Look, if a jury comes back with a virdict within only a few hours, then it can only be bad for the prosecution or the defence.

In this case, I'm positive it will be bad for the prosecution.

James12
Trial Period
Trial Period
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by James12 » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:49 pm

One of the things the media hasn't pointed out is that Michael has, throughout this trial, come through exactly as though he's innocent--human, vulnerable, emotional, concerned, decent, considerate, courteous, respectful, in brief as a true gentleman!--and in no way shape or form like the sick, cold-hearted predator Zonen has tried to paint him as.

In fact Zonen comes across as a thousand times more like the beast he's describing than Michael does. His character profile is so way off, I'm seriously wondering if he's on Crack.

I'm sure this won't be lost on the jurors though, especially as most of them said they can see beyond media spin.

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by sistahlamb » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:52 pm

Zonan has begun the pros. rebuttal.

Don't be suprised if he gets in to the "porn surfing alcholic who gets little boys into his bed" thing agian.

But I think it'll only show how damn desprate they are.

Frenchy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:31 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by Frenchy » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:54 pm

Originally posted by sistahlamb
Look, if a jury comes back with a virdict within only a few hours, then it can only be bad for the prosecution or the defence.
With all the PROVED inconsistencies, lies under oath, prosecution tricks and games and lack of evidence, I really don't think there's any way a clear, fast verdict of guilty can be found. I definitely think there's no way 12 jurors would agree right away that the prosecution has proven their case beyond reasonable doubt when even (most of) the media agree that they haven't and that the defense's job was a lot better.

Now, what I don't get is have the deliberations begun? Because if they have not, how can the jury already ask for an extension? Are they allowed to talk among themselves before the beginning of the deliberations?

HeavenSent
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 10007
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official June 3 2005

Post by HeavenSent » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:54 pm

Oooh butterflies...whew!
[align=center]Image[/align]

Cristine87
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3864
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by Cristine87 » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:55 pm

Originally posted by sistahlamb
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mjjf:
DirtyDiana2000: (Diane Dimond) She said that the jury requested a time extension to deliberate because they feel they could reach a verdict today, it was GRANTED! So the extension is for a few hours until like 5pm to 5:30 pacific. Michael has to stay in the area until then. This is coming from fans who were in court.

Just more on the extra time the jury are getting today.
Holy Shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MJJ_Lover
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:03 am

Official June 3 2005

Post by MJJ_Lover » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:57 pm

Has there been any other confirmation of this?
\\\"... You wanna draw a line and say that this is crime and this ain't crime.\\\" - Charles Manson.

~Vicky~

Official June 3 2005

Post by ~Vicky~ » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:58 pm

No, there is no confirmation...so don't run with it.

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by sistahlamb » Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:00 pm

Look, if a jury comes back with a virdict within only a few hours, then it can only be bad for the prosecution or the defence.
Let me rephrase that:

When a defendant is so obviously innocent or guilty, a jury can come back with a virdict within only a couple of hours or a few days.

That short of deliberations before reaching a virdict only says that it will only look bad for the prosecution or the defence.

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official June 3 2005

Post by sistahlamb » Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:01 pm

No, there is no confirmation...so don't run with it.
Diane Diamond reported that I believe.

SpecialJanet25
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm
Contact:

Official June 3 2005

Post by SpecialJanet25 » Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:01 pm

Ladies, and Gentleman, RELAX! This martathon is almost over! Anything can happen! You never know!
Image



Image

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests