Page 5 of 9

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:02 pm
by sistahlamb
Whoa whoa!!! Wait a minute!!!

What happened to this???

25658. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision ©, every
person who sells, furnishes, gives, or causes to be sold, furnished,
or given away, any alcoholic beverage to any person under the age of
21 years is guilty of a misdemeanor.

...

(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), any person who violates
subdivision (a) by furnishing an alcoholic beverage, or causing an
alcoholic beverage to be furnished, to a minor shall be punished by a
fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000), no part of which shall be
suspended, and the person shall be required to perform not less than
24 hours of community service during hours when the person is not
employed and is not attending school.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:25 pm
by MJISHOT
Originally posted by NevaehDreamz
No.

All of them have to agree, otherwise it will be a hung jury and the case can be retried.
oh dear, thats hard tho... if they all have sense they will all vote not guilty, but maybe one may disagree... :thumbsdow

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:26 pm
by got2makeitright
I dont know what the outcome will be but lets all pray.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:27 pm
by LadyJackson
The judge is a word that I can't say because if I say it, I'll get kicked off this board!! :screaming

Now he wants to put this lame ass furnishing charge in there and that is truly a violation of Michael's rights!!! He is charged with USING ALCOHOL FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMMITTING A FELONY, NOT FURNISHING!!!!!!!! I HATE THAT JUDGE SOOOOOOO MUCH!!! :screaming

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:56 pm
by Cristine87
I don't see how the hell they can get Michael on the alcohol charge. Did anybody say they saw Michael giving these kids alcohol? Is there any evidence at all that Michael gave these kids alcohol? Maybe I missed something!

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:00 pm
by sistahlamb
Exactly Christine. There is no proof and the only thing that has been proven regarding the alcholol charge is G and his brother were getting it themselves and boozing when Michael wasn't anywhere near NL!!!!

How the hell the prosecution will be able to prove that charge, I don't really think they can.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:08 pm
by Cristine87
Yeah, that's just it! They can't prove it! How can a jury of 12 convict Michael on this charge when it's such a weak ass charge? These kids drank alcohol on their own & there's no evidence that Michael had anything to do with it.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:15 pm
by sistahlamb
Whatever happened to the conspirisy charge???

Will that be excluded from closings since it is basically a nonexistant charge at this point???

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:26 pm
by SapphireScorpio
procisely. There is no, physical evidence or proof that Michael Jackson gave Gavin and Star Arviso any alchol of any kind. The only evidence, which I must say in opinion, absolutely, posotufely cr*p. The jurors have only got the word of Gavin anf his young brother, Star. And with anyone, your mouth is the only way of escaping truth. You can lie like hell, and you would get away with blue murder. So people, like Gavin are all actors/actresses. They have been rehearsed.

More people have said, from the prosecution and defense that Gavin and Star (sometimes encluding Devilain) being caught drinking alchol. The jurors are likely to say that Michael Jackson is not guilty of that charge, because where is the evidence? Is it right in front of their eyes? no. Is there are bottle of wine, on the evidence table? no. So what are the jurors going to say, to that charge? Not Guilty! Like with the rest of the charges. Where are all the other evidence? Like;

Urine/Blood/Skin samples?
Bottle of "Jesus Juice" Wine?
Condoms?
Sperm?

Nowhere. So just don't allow this to get to you, you guys. We are know that Michael Jackson is a innocent man; yes he will be free, but he will be marked as a man that has had too much against him in his life; people, paparazzi, news reporters...But Michael will and will always be innocent. Don't allow this to get to you.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:30 pm
by Cristine87
Yeah, they only have Gavin & Star's word & those two are not exactly believable!

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:31 pm
by senecajackson
Originally posted by Cristine87
Yeah, that's just it! They can't prove it! How can a jury of 12 convict Michael on this charge when it's such a weak ass charge? These kids drank alcohol on their own & there's no evidence that Michael had anything to do with it.
Good point! :thumbsup
See ya'll this just goes to show how DESPERATE the prosecution is!
I never seen anyone that wanted someone to be childmolester more than Tom Sneddon wants Michael to be!

I hate this! This is so unfair of them to throw that charge in! :nonono:

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:45 pm
by frozen rose
Maybe the reason Sneddon wants Michael to be proven a molestator, is because Sneddon is one himself, but just doesn't want to admit it.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 4:07 pm
by senecajackson
Who knows....I wouldn't put it past his ass Fran....

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 4:09 pm
by frozen rose
:lol: :crackingu I won't a promise on Michael Jackson's life.

Offical 31st May 2005 Thread: No court today, just discussion about instru.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 4:39 pm
by Cristine87
So, I'm assuming closing arguments start tomorrow!