Official May 27 2005 thread

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 27, 2005 3:09 pm

Rikki Klieman (court TV): Mickey Sherman called the judge's decision absurd to allow the tape in and then to tell the jury to disregard the susbtance of it and only consider his demeanor. Another attorney on there and Sherman said the prosecution wants a do-over.

Alec Rose also said that this tape won't be a spontaneous admission. He says that if the kid hadn't made an allegation before that taped interview with police, how'd the police know to interview him? How'd they know when to start taping his interview? He said its' something fishy about that situation.

got2makeitright
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by got2makeitright » Fri May 27, 2005 3:10 pm

Which means?? lol

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by dangerous » Fri May 27, 2005 3:21 pm

whats a "do-over"?
[align=center]Image[/align]

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by dangerous » Fri May 27, 2005 3:29 pm

absurd to allow the tape in and then to tell the jury to disregard the susbtance of it and only consider his demeanor.
so the jury should beleive gavin if he looks beleivable while delivering the lie? Even if its a proven lie? Thats one for the law textbooks.
[align=center]Image[/align]

Cristine87
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3864
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by Cristine87 » Fri May 27, 2005 3:31 pm

Originally posted by dangerous
so the jury should beleive gavin if he looks beleivable while delivering the lie? Even if its a proven lie?
Basically, does he look scripted or coached?

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by dangerous » Fri May 27, 2005 3:33 pm

Yes but if the video is the old set of charges Gavin will have to admit to have lied about the charges before, ie all those timeline regards. So once Gavin admits to have mispoke about the previous charges, the jurors should DISREGARD those lies and just use the video to see if he is beleivable, EVEN IF IT WAS JUST SHOWN HE LIED? no sense!!
[align=center]Image[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 27, 2005 3:36 pm

Originally posted by dangerous
whats a "do-over"?
It means he thinks the prosecution is trying to sneak and re-try their case during their rebuttal phase.

Cristine87
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3864
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by Cristine87 » Fri May 27, 2005 3:37 pm

Originally posted by dangerous
Yes but if the video is the old set of charges Gavin will have to admit to have lied about the charges before, ie all those timeline regards. So once Gavin admits to have mispoke about the previous charges, the jurors should DISREGARD those lies and just use the video to see if he is beleivable, EVEN IF IT WAS JUST SHOWN HE LIED? no sense!!
It looks that way! I agree, it's stupid. If he lied, it's important that that be pointed out to the jury. For the judge to say that it can't be is ludacrious!

got2makeitright
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by got2makeitright » Fri May 27, 2005 3:52 pm

So the judge can say is ok if he lie about the old charges but look at how he ask on the tape!! sSHH.

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 27, 2005 3:59 pm

test

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 27, 2005 4:01 pm



Murray Richman and Alec Rose

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 27, 2005 4:05 pm



Rikki Klieman and Murray Richman

got2makeitright
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by got2makeitright » Fri May 27, 2005 4:15 pm

its not working!!

sunny2005
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:15 am

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by sunny2005 » Fri May 27, 2005 4:28 pm

news flash MSNBC

Michael Jackson's defense suddenly rests without presenting rebuttal case
the prosecution is sunk!
:2mjghetto :icon_afro

got2makeitright
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 27 2005 thread

Post by got2makeitright » Fri May 27, 2005 4:30 pm

CNN Breaking News - the defense rest no rebuttal case closing argument Tuesday

Is that good or bad?? What about gavin coming back and all those people that were called back!! I need to know.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests