Official May 24 2005 thread

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Tue May 24, 2005 3:06 am

official

-MyAngelMJ-
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by -MyAngelMJ- » Tue May 24, 2005 3:34 am

Can't wait for todays proceedings. Hope Jay Leno speaks the truth.
[align=center][/align]



[align=center] Enya's New CD : \\\"Amarantine\\\" Release Date : November 22nd, 2005[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Tue May 24, 2005 4:44 am


Re: Connie Keenan

-MyAngelMJ-
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by -MyAngelMJ- » Tue May 24, 2005 5:11 am

Shouldn't the Thread title be "Official May 24 2005 thread" ???
[align=center][/align]



[align=center] Enya's New CD : \\\"Amarantine\\\" Release Date : November 22nd, 2005[/align]

Black Loafers
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1216
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by Black Loafers » Tue May 24, 2005 5:46 am

:laugh
*14/11-06 I saw Michael outside his hotel in London.

He waved and smiled and he was soo beautiful.

*15/11-06 I saw Michael at the Wold Music Awards!:cloud9:licklips

Dreams do come true :wub:



http://www.myspace.com/ebbalovesmj

HotMJ!
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 716
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:47 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by HotMJ! » Tue May 24, 2005 6:00 am

Originally posted by whisper


http://site2.mjeol.com/flash/CourtTV_Co ... -23-05.swf

Re: Connie Keenan

"Rude?" RUDE??

Sneddumb is a LOT worse than "RUDE!" Snedd@ss is an ass!

Sure wish we all could see him behind bars himself one day, instead of fingering the keys to them!!!




:sneddoncr Smirky Sneddon SHAMED!

.

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by sistahlamb » Tue May 24, 2005 10:54 am

I was kinda confused not seeing today's date I thought there wan't any court today!!!!

Anyway, the prosecution said that the defence's case would end by today but I don't think it will. Even if the defence will not be using certian witnesses at this point, they still have many other witnesses to call.

But who knows, right???

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Tue May 24, 2005 10:56 am

Flashback

>> GMA: Leno tapes March 16 2005 A

Submitted Date: 2005/3/16
Description:
Air date: March 18 2005

ABC gets their hands on a transcript of what Leno told police.
-it shows the accuser to be lying on the stand when he claims he never spoke to Jay Leno
-Leno says he saw the Bashir tape and it reminded him of the "unusual name" of the accuser
(my note: So they told Leno his name. That's how he knew that this was a grifter who called him)

alfredo
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 350
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:26 am

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by alfredo » Tue May 24, 2005 11:15 am

Originally posted by whisper
Flashback

>> GMA: Leno tapes March 16 2005 A

Submitted Date: 2005/3/16
Description:
Air date: March 18 2005

ABC gets their hands on a transcript of what Leno told police.
-it shows the accuser to be lying on the stand when he claims he never spoke to Jay Leno
-Leno says he saw the Bashir tape and it reminded him of the "unusual name" of the accuser
(my note: So they told Leno his name. That's how he knew that this was a grifter who called him)

I hope these fools don't try anything. The DA let this kid get up on the stand and lie. Maybe they thought it would be worse if he admitted it on the stand because Mez would have ripped into him right there on the spot and the case would have been all but over before they got to show their porn collection. They had to know this was out there. I want to see how they try to get out of this one. Its obviously the same kid because this one left several messages and Jay had to tell the other comics to get this kid off his back and stop leaving messages.

So, he can't claim it wasn't the same kid. Jay may try to soften the blow for prosecutors by trying to diminish the call and the chilling effect of the mother coaching her sick son.

I'm waiting for the paralegal on the JCPenneys case and Chris Tucker!!!

HotMJ!
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 716
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:47 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by HotMJ! » Tue May 24, 2005 11:16 am

:badmood
Demon Dimond



TheJusticeSystem.net* (May 23, 2005) is reporting that Diane Dimond's "Blackberry" device was banned this morning by Judge:drinkingbMelville!





Demon Dimond
:ratingsho



:dimondsneddon: :noseeallthat :sneddonexorcist :sneddoncr Sneaky Sneddon SHAMED!




* http://www.thejusticesystem.net/

.

got2makeitright
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by got2makeitright » Tue May 24, 2005 11:16 am

Besides chirs tucker and jay leno who else is there to call on the stand?? Would it suck if the judge plays today a Larry king thingy today with chirs or Jay?? :screaming

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by sistahlamb » Tue May 24, 2005 11:35 am

Isn't Chris Tucker also supposed to be testifying about the Miami trip thing ans how it was actually his idea t obring them out there????

At least that's what Roger Friedman said but this article could be factual


Chris Tucker in [Jackson's] Mess
By Roger Friedman
--old article

Debbie Rowe, Hamid Moslehi, Cynthia Ann Bell, Janet Arvizo. Especially Janet Arvizo. They're just a few of the witnesses who've backfired for the prosecution in their case against Michael Jackson. Rarely have so many state's witnesses turned out to be bonuses for the defense.

Now comes word that the defense has a blockbuster revelation for the jury in Santa Maria that should really kick the props out from underneath the district attorney's wobbly case: The idea to have the Arvizo family to fly to Miami in February 2003 was not Michael Jackson's at all. It was comedian Chris Tucker's.

Whoops.

For a year and a half now, we've heard the same story over and over: Michael Jackson summoned the Arvizo family to Miami for a press conference on Feb. 6, 2003. The family said they were picked up by Jackson's limo driver, Gary Hearne, for a commercial flight to Miami. Then they were told at the last minute that a change had been made, and that they would fly with Tucker on a private plane. The family has claimed that they were supposed to take part in a press conference when they arrived.


So far no one has asked why Tucker was involved, who rented the plane, or whose idea any of this was. Also unexplained is what happened to the press conference: Why didn't it happen? Why did no one mention it again? If Janet Arvizo was right, and she had to memorize lines for a video, why wasn't she given a script or any information about the press conference once she arrived in Miami? How did this whole misadventure in February, 2003 between Michael Jackson and the Arvizo family begin?

Here are some of the answers that will be spilling out as Jackson's team prepares to launch a defense in the next week.

According to my sources, the trip to Miami was not Jackson's idea at all. It was Tucker's. Here's what went down, from what we can piece together: Tucker – who'd met the Arvizos through Jamie Masada's comedy camp – will testify that the Arvizos called him on or around Feb. 5, 2003, frantic to find Jackson.

According to the testimony of Janet Arvizo's husband, Jay Jackson, two British tabloid reporters turned up in their apartment building on Feb. 4, the morning after "Living with Michael Jackson" aired in Britain. Jay Jackson testified to negotiating with the reporters for a fee.

In the end, however, the reporters will say that when they returned with a contract for Jackson and the Arvizos, the family was gone. What happened?

We can surmise at this point that Jay Jackson or Janet Arvizo placed a call to Tucker, thinking he could connect them with Michael. This was perhaps to have their silence bought. Arvizo told Tucker that she was desperate to get in touch with Jackson.

The family had had no contact with him since the one day documentary shoot in September 2002. Jackson had even changed his phone numbers. In short order, Tucker called Jackson in Miami. "You'll never guess who's here," he said.

Tucker will testify that he had already booked a private plane to Orlando, where he has a home. He was on his way to the NBA All-Star game in Atlanta, where he has yet another residence. His brother was set to meet him there.

But all of a sudden things changed. Tucker, stuck now with the Arvizos, suggested to Jackson that he could bring the family to Miami and leave them there. And that's what he did.

On the stand, Janet Arvizo complained that Tucker was put in a different part of the Turnberry Isle Hotel when they all arrived the next day. That may have been because Tucker hadn't planned on spending the night in Miami at all.

After Tucker hung up the phone, Jackson's people scrambled to get the family and Tucker rooms in the hotel. It was all, I am told, incredibly unplanned, unscripted, and off the cuff.

Much of this can be underscored, I am told, by notes kept by Jackson's top aide Evvy Tavasci. Contrary to Janet Arvizo's statements, Tavasci never made travel arrangements for the family to go to Miami or even to be picked up by Hearne.

So much for the theory that Jackson and his managers masterminded a plot to bring the family to Florida. And the press conference? No one – not Tucker, his friend Brett Ratner, Jackson's staff – has ever had any idea where that came from.

There was no press conference ever scheduled," says my source. "It may have just been something in Janet Arvizo's mind."

That is less strange than it sounds, since no preparation was ever made for a press conference. And it would have been easier, my source argues, for Jackson simply to return home and have a press conference with the Arvizos in Los Angeles, rather than fly them all to Miami and then back again in less than 48 hours. And there's proof that Jackson was already set to return from Miami on Feb. 7. He had an appointment with Ed Bradley of "60 Minutes."

I am told that not only can Tucker attest to the general validity of this scenario, but so too can his ex-fiancee, Azja Pryor, and "Rush Hour" director Ratner. There may be others as well.

And when this story unravels on the stand, my sources insist, it will fill in the blanks about why the Arvizos went to Miami. If it's true – and I have reason to believe it is – the underpinnings of the conspiracy case will be kicked out for good.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,154987,00.html

got2makeitright
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by got2makeitright » Tue May 24, 2005 11:51 am

Did Mj sell neverland?

betty boop 84
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:27 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by betty boop 84 » Tue May 24, 2005 11:54 am

Originally posted by got2makeitright
Did Mj sell neverland?
No
Image

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 24 2005 thread

Post by sistahlamb » Tue May 24, 2005 11:55 am

I'm not one of the admins or anything but this isn't a thread to be talking about that...I think there's a thread about it on the MJ Conversations board, though.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests