Official May 20 2005 thread

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by sistahlamb » Fri May 20, 2005 6:47 pm

I just heard something about the defence arguing with the prosecution about allowing testimony of a cop that was involved in the 1993 case.

Does anyone know anything about this???

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 20, 2005 6:51 pm

Originally posted by sistahlamb
I just heard something about the defence arguing with the prosecution about allowing testimony of a cop that was involved in the 1993 case.

Does anyone know anything about this???

Where did you hear that?

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by sistahlamb » Fri May 20, 2005 6:57 pm

Where did you hear that?


It was something posted on a thread on MJNO forums.

But someone just told me that the judge ruled out his testimony for some reason I still don't know. I haven't heard anything substansial about it yet.

MJISHOT
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by MJISHOT » Fri May 20, 2005 7:15 pm

i dont think the defense will rest their case yet! no way.
Image



http://www.myspace.com/mjfansunite

R.I.P Michael ~ god bless you our sweet angel!

sistahlamb
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by sistahlamb » Fri May 20, 2005 7:25 pm

I don't think they will either!!!!

Like I said, they still haven't gotten into the 1993 allegations and they might just do that soon.

The only reason thier case will not take as long as they origianlly planned was because they will not use any of thier charactor witnesses....this is not a bad thing they don't need them.

SpecialJanet25
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by SpecialJanet25 » Fri May 20, 2005 7:30 pm

Originally posted by sistahlamb
I don't think they will either!!!!

Like I said, they still haven't gotten into the 1993 allegations and they might just do that soon.

The only reason their case will not take as long as they origianlly planned was because they will not use any of thier character witnesses....this is not a bad thing they don't need them.


I agree! Plus, Mez did not say yet, when their case is finish. Zonen is trying to push it. Until I heard from my girl, Raymone or anything from the defense about when they will rest their case, I keep this as speculation.
Image



Image

believer
Trial Period
Trial Period
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:00 pm

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by believer » Fri May 20, 2005 8:03 pm

Before court recessed for the weekend the prosecution succeeded in blocking a defense bid to get a grant of immunity for a man named by prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator.

Prosecutors had granted Vincent Amen so-called use immunity during a lengthy interview about all the facts of the case, then decided not to call him as a prosecution witness.

The defense became interested in calling Amen as a witness and sought to retain his immunity, but the judge ruled against it.

Melville also refused to order the playing of a tape of Amen's interview with prosecutors.

The prosecution said it did not constitute testimony, but Sanger said it was invaluable.

"Everything is there. It provides everything the jury hasn't heard," he argued.

Sanger indicated the tape contains information about the relationship of Amen to the mother and her claims that she was held against her will. He said the reason prosecutors decided not to call Amen was that his interview helped the defense and contradicted the prosecution's case.

---
Wow, I can't believe that judge. Everytime he makes another ruling I just can't believe it. I wish more reporters would comment on it, the guy is so blatantly biased it's just not possible. At least the way Linda D reported it you can tell it wasn't fair.
Why wasn't the a**hole upset about Debbie's testimony, which really was the complete opposite of what the pros. had said? And this bl***y waiver for a period of time completely *irrelevant* makes him all hot and bothered.
I don't believe the guy. I hope he has nightmares.
Going to bed fuming
Night guys

danaluvsmj
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 3259
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 8:00 am
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by danaluvsmj » Fri May 20, 2005 8:04 pm

Image

aww whatta sweetie pie! :inlove
Image

1958-2009

Gone Too Soon

Eboni
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:25 pm

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by Eboni » Fri May 20, 2005 8:08 pm

Hey guys..

-Everyone should know by noe that Melville and his f**king girlfriend Tom Sneddumb is in on this sham together.!!!!!

- :buttkiss: ....Sneddumb kissing Melville's Ass!!!!

Purdy Young Thang
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 10:19 pm
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by Purdy Young Thang » Fri May 20, 2005 10:52 pm

Originally posted by Eboni
Hey guys..

-Everyone should know by noe that Melville and his f**king girlfriend Tom Sneddumb is in on this sham together.!!!!!

- :buttkiss: ....Sneddumb kissing Melville's Ass!!!!

LMAO!! Girlfriend!

Sooo right. Actually, Sneddung and JaNUT would make a nice couple.
Image Image Image Image



:love :love :love :love

love you always

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 20, 2005 11:09 pm



Joe Episcopo calls out disGrace

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by whisper » Fri May 20, 2005 11:14 pm

Oh and here's a clip from that other person, Renee Rockwell.



Renee Rockwell

~Vicky~

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by ~Vicky~ » Fri May 20, 2005 11:21 pm

Nancy Grace, something is definatly wrong with that woman.

~Vicky~

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by ~Vicky~ » Fri May 20, 2005 11:29 pm

Did she ever pick apart the mother for her obvious lies? Did she's state that she was tired of all the picking on the mother?

Cristine87
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3864
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm

Official May 20 2005 thread

Post by Cristine87 » Fri May 20, 2005 11:52 pm

Why doesn't that bitch just admit that she thinks Michael is guilty? She's so fu.cking stupid & self righteous! I love how when that lawyer calls her ass out she pauses & then wants to drop the discussion about Geragos. That's a dumb heffa!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest