Page 4 of 4

Official Jan 28 2005 Hearing

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:05 am
by HeavenSent
Originally posted by whisper
. He says Sneddon wanted it in to show why team Jackson allegedly "panicked" and decided to launch this prosecution-alleged "conspiracy". It's that kind of detail that is totally missing from these drive-by reports.

Here's Stan Goldman's comments:
http://site.mjeol.com/modules/mydownloa ... =9&lid=320
That some whacked logic. Michael was trying to do damage control because of people's reactions--He's a public figure! It's what public figures do! Please, Sneddon is giving himself too much credit. This damage control would have happened ever if the prosecution never existed. It wasn't about Michael committing a crime and then going "ooops, I'mma look bad for the prosecution, lemme do something to fix it."

Official Jan 28 2005 Hearing

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:25 am
by dangerous
that still doesnt explain why he would molest G after that damaging documentary.

Official Jan 28 2005 Hearing

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:05 pm
by SpecialJanet25
Originally posted by dangerous
that still doesnt explain why he would molest G after that damaging documentary.
Exactly!

Official Jan 28 2005 Hearing

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:46 pm
by ~Vicky~
Originally posted by HeavenSent
That some whacked logic. Michael was trying to do damage control because of people's reactions--He's a public figure! It's what public figures do! Please, Sneddon is giving himself too much credit. This damage control would have happened ever if the prosecution never existed. It wasn't about Michael committing a crime and then going "ooops, I'mma look bad for the prosecution, lemme do something to fix it."

Exactly. Wow..a celebrity want to do clean-up after a bad PR move. Conspiracy!

Please.