Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
Moderator: Global Moderator
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 10007
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
- Contact:
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
At last, a ruling I can smile about. Put up or shut up. I like that. Thats how it should be.
[align=center]
[/align]

-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm
- Contact:
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
For once, this damn judge is opening his eyes. I like too PUT UP or SHUT UP. AMEN. IT BEEN GOOD DAY FOR DEFENSE.
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
yea hooray for melville who talks the talk, but never walks the walk.
[align=center]
[/align]

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
I'm sorry guys- but I don't like to talk about this case in good day , bad day terms- I have yet to see any indication of this being a fair trial for Michael. All of this is just..........
[align=center]MiKe JaCk CrEw
4 LiFe[/align]
4 LiFe[/align]
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 10007
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
- Contact:
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
I wouldn't categorize it that way. For your own sanity. It's been a proven fact that things aren't always as they seem.Originally posted by Mimonde
I'm sorry guys- but I don't like to talk about this case in good day , bad day terms-
I smiled at the ruling because it's what I wanted. But the drunkard judge's motivations have never been pure. Hmm, wait and see, right?
[align=center]
[/align]

-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
It's about damn time! How were they gonna prove these past acts anyway?
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
how can you perpare accordingly if you dont know what will be allowed in untill AFTER the pros case? how are you suppose to plan effectively? It makes no sense. If he wants to see if there is a case, you take it to a prelim, you dont test to see if there is a case during the trial, make a rulling, and then be like, "Ok defense, plan your case accordingly with these new 65465465 peices of added evidence, by the way ur up next week" what a crock
[align=center]
[/align]

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
Exactly!Originally posted by dangerous
how can you perpare accordingly if you dont know what will be allowed in untill AFTER the pros case? how are you suppose to plan effectively? It makes no sense. If he wants to see if there is a case, you take it to a prelim, you dont test to see if there is a case during the trial, make a rulling, and then be like, "Ok defense, plan your case accordingly with these new 65465465 peices of added evidence, by the way ur up next week" what a crock
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
>> Court TV: Leo Terrell Blasts Prosecution Jan 12 2005
Version: .wmv
Submitted Date: 2005/1/12
Edit This DownloadDescription:
Air date: Jan 12 2005
(the other crap has been cut out)
Leo Terrell says Jackson has a right to confrontation
-says it'll be unbelievable if this judge allows this to be 7 little mini trials
-says prosecutor's latest actions indicate that they have a problem
-says Jackson DOES NOT fit the so-called "pedophile profile"
-made the point that there hasn't been 1 single conviction in anything in 46 years
(my note: this is the first criminal case against Jackson for anything)
-says the $20M is peanuts to Mike
…and more
9.35 MB
Version: .wmv
Submitted Date: 2005/1/12
Edit This DownloadDescription:
Air date: Jan 12 2005
(the other crap has been cut out)
Leo Terrell says Jackson has a right to confrontation
-says it'll be unbelievable if this judge allows this to be 7 little mini trials
-says prosecutor's latest actions indicate that they have a problem
-says Jackson DOES NOT fit the so-called "pedophile profile"
-made the point that there hasn't been 1 single conviction in anything in 46 years
(my note: this is the first criminal case against Jackson for anything)
-says the $20M is peanuts to Mike
…and more
9.35 MB
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm
- Contact:
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
Originally posted by SpecialJanet25
What does Mr. Terrell mean when he said $20M is peanuts to Michael?
It means $20 million to him is = to $2 for us.
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 3134
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
Well Melville surprised me.
[img width=450 height=250]http://i902.photobucket.com/albums/ac22 ... cemike.jpg[/img]
-
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 1:00 pm
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
He's probably realised that hes making it too obvious that hes backing the prosecution...hes just buttering us up..IMO
[align=center]
[/align]
QUOTE
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Loyalty is such a rare quality, but my fans are the most loyal in the world\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" - Michael 11/04
[align=center]We Love You Michael[/align]

QUOTE
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Loyalty is such a rare quality, but my fans are the most loyal in the world\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" - Michael 11/04
[align=center]We Love You Michael[/align]
Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing
Originally posted by sexymichael
He's probably realised that hes making it too obvious that hes backing the prosecution...hes just buttering us up..IMO
No, the ruling is unfair.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests