Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

HeavenSent
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 10007
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by HeavenSent » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:28 pm

At last, a ruling I can smile about. Put up or shut up. I like that. Thats how it should be.
[align=center]Image[/align]

SpecialJanet25
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm
Contact:

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by SpecialJanet25 » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:45 pm

For once, this damn judge is opening his eyes. I like too PUT UP or SHUT UP. AMEN. IT BEEN GOOD DAY FOR DEFENSE.
Image



Image

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by dangerous » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:50 pm

yea hooray for melville who talks the talk, but never walks the walk.
[align=center]Image[/align]

Mimonde
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:01 pm

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by Mimonde » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:56 pm

I'm sorry guys- but I don't like to talk about this case in good day , bad day terms- I have yet to see any indication of this being a fair trial for Michael. All of this is just..........
[align=center]MiKe JaCk CrEw

4 LiFe[/align]

HeavenSent
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 10007
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by HeavenSent » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:59 pm

Originally posted by Mimonde
I'm sorry guys- but I don't like to talk about this case in good day , bad day terms-
I wouldn't categorize it that way. For your own sanity. It's been a proven fact that things aren't always as they seem.

I smiled at the ruling because it's what I wanted. But the drunkard judge's motivations have never been pure. Hmm, wait and see, right?
[align=center]Image[/align]

Cristine87
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3864
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by Cristine87 » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:59 pm

It's about damn time! How were they gonna prove these past acts anyway?

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by dangerous » Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:02 pm

how can you perpare accordingly if you dont know what will be allowed in untill AFTER the pros case? how are you suppose to plan effectively? It makes no sense. If he wants to see if there is a case, you take it to a prelim, you dont test to see if there is a case during the trial, make a rulling, and then be like, "Ok defense, plan your case accordingly with these new 65465465 peices of added evidence, by the way ur up next week" what a crock
[align=center]Image[/align]

~Vicky~

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by ~Vicky~ » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:12 pm

Originally posted by dangerous
how can you perpare accordingly if you dont know what will be allowed in untill AFTER the pros case? how are you suppose to plan effectively? It makes no sense. If he wants to see if there is a case, you take it to a prelim, you dont test to see if there is a case during the trial, make a rulling, and then be like, "Ok defense, plan your case accordingly with these new 65465465 peices of added evidence, by the way ur up next week" what a crock
Exactly!

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by whisper » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:36 pm

>> Court TV: Leo Terrell Blasts Prosecution Jan 12 2005

Version: .wmv
Submitted Date: 2005/1/12
Edit This DownloadDescription:
Air date: Jan 12 2005

(the other crap has been cut out)
Leo Terrell says Jackson has a right to confrontation
-says it'll be unbelievable if this judge allows this to be 7 little mini trials
-says prosecutor's latest actions indicate that they have a problem
-says Jackson DOES NOT fit the so-called "pedophile profile"
-made the point that there hasn't been 1 single conviction in anything in 46 years
(my note: this is the first criminal case against Jackson for anything)
-says the $20M is peanuts to Mike
…and more

9.35 MB

SpecialJanet25
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm
Contact:

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by SpecialJanet25 » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 pm

What does Mr. Terrell mean when he said $20M is peanuts to Michael?
Image



Image

~Vicky~

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by ~Vicky~ » Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:29 pm

Originally posted by SpecialJanet25
What does Mr. Terrell mean when he said $20M is peanuts to Michael?

It means $20 million to him is = to $2 for us.

Tiger Lilly
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by Tiger Lilly » Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:35 pm

Well Melville surprised me.

sexymichael
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 1:00 pm

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by sexymichael » Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:43 pm

He's probably realised that hes making it too obvious that hes backing the prosecution...hes just buttering us up..IMO
[align=center]Image[/align]

QUOTE

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Loyalty is such a rare quality, but my fans are the most loyal in the world\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" - Michael 11/04



[align=center]We Love You Michael[/align]

~Vicky~

Official Jan 12 2005 Hearing

Post by ~Vicky~ » Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:34 pm

Originally posted by sexymichael
He's probably realised that hes making it too obvious that hes backing the prosecution...hes just buttering us up..IMO

No, the ruling is unfair.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests