Page 5 of 6

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:56 pm
by Tiger Lilly
LOL @ me and whisper. :laugh

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:02 pm
by A.Beautiful.Mind
Why do people get such a kick out of showing Michael's Private pocessions :uh_uh:

~Jamie~

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:04 pm
by urbanpinkpixie
I don't know and for some reason I would feel like I would be intruding or something. I just wouldn't like people going through my stuff like it was worthless junk.

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:18 pm
by Tiger Lilly
I wonder how that meeting is/will going/go? :cryptic

These are those who we know will be present in the ex-parte (no prosecution) meeting at 3.
-- the defense team
-- melville
-- the ex-hubby of crazy-mom
-- the new laywer of crazy-mom

:cryptic

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:38 pm
by sexymichael
This is me exactly.... :makesense:
thanks for helping me tho Gem :heart2:

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:45 pm
by Tiger Lilly
LOL you're welcome. :) PM me again if you wanna ask anything else, not that I'm any expert. :laugh

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:52 pm
by ~Vicky~
Originally posted by dangerous
its not as if any of us were hoping that Melville would release a fair decision ANYWAY. This isnt the end of the world, but it is another big thorn in the ass. The mental examinations were denied, but they can STILL appeal it, they can use old medical records, use old testimony, and a bunch of other aspects to attack the credibility of the mother.

These mental examinations were to assess the competency of the mother and her children in regards to them testifying at trial. It was denied- OK- BUT the defense is still hanging on plenty of medical records that possibly could show to the jury (regardless of expert testimony) that these lyings ass biznatches are criizzaay.

We are going to lose EVERY motion- we just need to drill that into our heads.
That about sums it up. Hurry up January 31st.

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:59 pm
by ~Vicky~
So whyyy is it important to show to the world them searching through Michael's house? I don't understand that at all. So people can speculate more and taint more people?

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:12 pm
by whisper
Feldman jumped ship! I just can't believe that! He had his teeth sunk into this case, so for him to be OUT and a new lawyer to be in, something must be REALLY going down.

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:14 pm
by Tiger Lilly
:D whisper!

edit Nevermind. :D

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:24 pm
by HeavenSent
Originally posted by whisper
Feldman jumped ship! I just can't believe that! He had his teeth sunk into this case, so for him to be OUT and a new lawyer to be in, something must be REALLY going down.
Oh my goodness....


Damn.


Makes me sooo anxious over what's gonna go down at this private meeting!!!!!!!!

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:40 pm
by whisper
Judge did grant the defense's motion to release transcripts of the grand jury selection process as long as the jurors names are redacted. (That was on the Fox news crawl at the bottom of he screen)

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:48 pm
by HeavenSent
Originally posted by whisper
Judge did grant the defense's motion to release transcripts of the grand jury selection process as long as the jurors names are redacted. (That was on the Fox news crawl at the bottom of he screen)
So the defense has already picked up on something potentially fishy w/the jury selection process? Why would they want to release a transcript of that? Are they basically trying to get as many motions out there as they can?

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:49 pm
by ~Vicky~
Originally posted by whisper
Judge did grant the defense's motion to release transcripts of the grand jury selection process as long as the jurors names are redacted. (That was on the Fox news crawl at the bottom of he screen)

So how many motions from the defense has the judge granted in all. 1.005? :nonono:

Official Nov 29 2004 Hearing Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 7:03 pm
by whisper
For The Record: Quick News On Mariah Carey And Nelly, Coldplay, Britney, Michael Jackson, Buckethead & More
11.29.2004 5:55 PM EST
...

Michael Jackson's team lost one battle and won another in court on Monday (November 29). While the judge rejected the singer's request to have a psychologist examine his accuser, the defense may still get its hands on employment, banking, military, psychiatric and medical records involving the alleged victim's family, including the gynecological records of the boy's sister and mother. Judge Rodney Melville said that the defense could seek the records, but ordered them to notify the people referenced in those records, and gave those people five days to challenge the records' release. Melville also granted the defense's request to release grand-jury transcripts. ...

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/149424 ... lines=true