Page 1 of 4

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:25 am
by dangerous
Today:

Bail hearing
Hearing on Evvy's raid
Motion for DA's recusal


Should be fun. :bs

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:35 am
by Tiger Lilly
Why not skip ahead to the Appeal's court right now, save us all alot of time. :careless

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:52 am
by A.Beautiful.Mind
I hope everything turns out okay today.. I supposse that asking for too much though. I'm not feeling that optimistic about this hearing today, I fear that the request from the state's office will influence the Judges decision too much and it may result in denying the motions which have been put foward towards him. *Fingers Crossed*

~Jamie~

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:54 am
by Tiger Lilly
[quote]Originally posted by *Ã

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:31 pm
by dangerous
ohohh they want that tape BAD. I like it :D

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:34 pm
by Tiger Lilly
Originally posted by dangerous
ohohh they want that tape BAD. I like it :D
Ashely (or anyone), can you explain to me about this tape. I don't really get it. :smacking

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:37 pm
by Michael Jackson's Kougra
yeah!!! ***what Gem said***

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:51 pm
by dangerous
There are 2 tapes the BM tape and this tape (tape2). The prosecution wants both, they were given a PARTIAL COPY of the BM tape, they want the whole thing, the defense said no, wait until 30days before trial. The defense showed the prosecution that they only have a piece of the tape at the trial when they played parts of it the prosecution never heard before. (I hope im correct, my memory is kinda hazy) The prosecution keeps brining up the “Sanchez” motion because that motion is what compels the defense to hand over inculpatory evidence (evidence that proves MJ commit the crime) Melville denied there motion and said he believes Mez knows the law. Mez says he isn’t hiding anything and that there is no inculpatory evidence but the prosecution thinks those tapes are.

The defense came in possession of tape2 which apparently:
is, perhaps self-evidently, the product of Mr. (blank)'s commission of the crime of secretly recording a telephone conversation without Mrs. (blank)'s knowledge or permission on behalf of Michael Jackson
So the defense, for their own reasons, (they weren’t compelled to or anything) gave them a copy of the tape2 and now the prosecution wants to know where it came from, saying that it could possibly be the omission of one of the UNINDICTED coconspirators admitting to false imprison, extort, bla bla blah

i hope that made sense, i was kinda rushin and ive read so many motions ive confused myself

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:56 pm
by whisper
You can tape someone who is talking about committing a crime without their knowlege. So Franklin's full of $hit with that motion.

I suspect this mother was secretly recorded making threats against Michael or talking about committing fraud, lying, threats and/or extortion. And prosecutors are just trying to turn the issue around. No way the defense would worry about anyone giving them any tape if that tape isn't very very telling about these people.

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:01 pm
by mjlovergurl
is this tape good or bad for micheal's sake? im confused! lol

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:32 pm
by HeavenSent
Oh :censored: I'm slipping. I totally forgot about today.
I suspect this mother was secretly recorded making threats against Michael or talking about committing fraud, lying, threats and/or extortion. And prosecutors are just trying to turn the issue around. No way the defense would worry about anyone giving them any tape if that tape isn't very very telling about these people.
Exactly.

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:41 pm
by ~Vicky~
Originally posted by mjlovergurl
is this tape good or bad for micheal's sake? im confused! lol
Why not read the thread and find out?






This whole thing is getting me mad. How can the AG take over when he filed a motion opposing to do so? It won't happen.

Fuc.king hypocrites, this whole thing. This is how innocent people get in jail.

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:42 pm
by dangerous
How can the AG take over when he filed a motion opposing to do so
he wont.. a special prosecutor would be called in i think.

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:51 pm
by ~Vicky~
So many damn delays. Michael will be 80 by the time he is tried.

How many motions for the defense has that fu.ck of a judge actually granted? I am so irritated right now..I've just ruined my day.

November 4th Hearing Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:53 pm
by dangerous
fu.ck of a judge

LMAO.

Very few, the "law" is agaisnt Michael very much right now. We'll have to wait for some appeals decisions to see where we are.