Official August 17 Hearing

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

LadyJackson
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 2:06 am

Official August 17 Hearing

Post by LadyJackson » Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:44 pm

Ok...I have heard it all now!!!! :laugh How the HELL could Mike's aides even get the urine sample????!!! Everybody in their RIGHT minds know that you TAKE A URINE SMAPLE AT THE DOCTOR'S OFFICE!!! :crackingu I have done it before!! Why the hell would the doctor make you go ALL the way HOME to pee in a cup when there is a bathroom right in the office!!??!! :crackingu


Oxman knew he was gonna get fined that's why he had his check-book in the first place!!! Oxman IS OFFICALLY "A GANGSTA"!!! :crackingu
Image

The man is absolutely gorgeous!!!:mf_w00t2:

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official August 17 Hearing

Post by dangerous » Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:52 pm

Originally posted by whisper
MJDANCER123 Posted: Aug 18 2004, 09:43 AM

She said that another question that Mr. Oxman asked Dr. katz on the stand yesterday was this: " Dr. Katz, do you know a woman by the name of Linda Fienstock (jen is not sure of the spelling of last name) ?" Have you ever met her?"

Dr. Katz said he couldnt discuss (jens words here) a current or potential patient.

Jen said that Linda Fienstock is or was Bradley Millers Assistant. The questioning did not go further on this subject.
If theres is any connection there, im beginnning to there is only one physiciatrist in all of Santa Barbara. :careless


Also, can a Dr. assert privilidge if the person isnt a patient? So saying he wont reply because of privilide, doesnt that automatically allude to him being his patient?
[align=center]Image[/align]

mello1
Trial Period
Trial Period
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 12:32 am

Official August 17 Hearing

Post by mello1 » Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:57 pm

Originally posted by dangerous
If theres is any connection there, im beginnning to there is only one physiciatrist in all of Santa Barbara. :careless


Also, can a Dr. assert privilidge if the person isnt a patient? So saying he wont reply because of privilide, doesnt that automatically allude to him being his patient?
Yeah, I guess if Oxman had asked if Katz knew his own wife, he wouldn't answer because she would be a potential patient. And gee, I thought what was actually said during those sessions was privieleged information, not whether or not a person is actually a patient!

Pondscum they are. :tickingti

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Official August 17 Hearing

Post by dangerous » Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:23 pm

Im excited for Dickerman to testify tomorrow, there is NO WAY that fruit didnt know that Miller didnt work for Geragos. Unless he confesses, he will perjure himself no ends tomrrow.

Ok, so lets run down the reasons given that the prosecution knew or should have known about the Miller-Geragos connection.
  • [*:3nvc5qlt]via Katz from Miller. Katz is also the one that originally reported molestation allegations to authorities.
    [*:3nvc5qlt]on tape, when he confessed to the defense, but retracted it the next day
    [*:3nvc5qlt]was in possession of letters from Dickerman to Geragos, Geragos to Dickerman, and Miller to Dickerman


and we still have mama, Jay Jackson, and Dickerman to hear from. Damn.. Melvilles ruling on this will prove very telling. :alarmcloc
[align=center]Image[/align]

Tiger Lilly
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm

Official August 17 Hearing

Post by Tiger Lilly » Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:03 pm

According to those sources, the family says that when the boy's cancer physician ordered a urine test, the Jackson camp was afraid it would reveal the alcohol in his system and asked the alleged victim's mother to cancel the doctor's appointment, but she refused.

Okay, so, mommy dearest is being "held hostage". She wants to get Gav!n a urine test, but keeping in mind we've already heard that she's seen Gav!n drink at Neverland herself while Michael was away and didn't do anything to stop him, she decides she wants him tested anyway. Step 1 of her frame-Michael-plan me thinks. Anyway... the Jackson camp supposedly don't want her to have him tested. Now if Michael's camp are as forceful as we're made to believe wouldn't they have stopped her by any means nessacary if they didn't want it to happen? Apparently not. No, they drive her to the docs themselves. Great hostage taking that is. :careless Are we seriously supposed to believe this?

I'm also looking forward to Dickerman testifying! And ya know, I don't think Melville can ignore this Katz/Miller/Feldman/Dickerman thing. Everyone is saying how much trouble the prosecuton is in right now. I just don't trust Melville and I'm kinda anxious about his ruling...

LuckyStar
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 7:39 pm

Official August 17 Hearing

Post by LuckyStar » Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:25 pm

Whoo... There is ALOT happening right now. Ive been sitting here for probably 1 ½ hour reading all this. This is so ridiculous. There are MILLIONS of evidence showing this "case" is a set up, why cant the judge see that? Why cant EVERYONE see that?
These are gonna be some hectic days.
Image



:inuyasha1 Inu!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests