My post from another site:
Since the SB Court Docs have been relocated and we have begun to use them to disprove many things we could not before Desiree has resurfaced also began reading some and cherry picking conversations or items Sneddon did/wanted to present as evidence in 2005.
She and perhaps several other (the fake MJ lovers) has made the rounds of the sites using the below doc: #1 and a mouth full of lies about what it says. The fake lovers are to bring it up in conversations with false tears in eye and sorrow in their hearts, because it looks like "maybe" Michael was collecting some of the boys underwear, was doing cocaine and did take and keep picture of naked boys. And for sure was gay.....oh sob...boohoo.
Because we have so many young fans, fans from other nations, very busy fans and those who do not have time to read weekly investigative reports on Helena's site this lie was getting out of hand, bewildering some and causing fights btw others.
Thanks to Desiree accusations Helena, Lynette and others on the Vindicating Michael site were able to cleared this up, by reading what was really said rather than what was first taken as factual statements from official docs. Also by remember Sneddon often injected misleading words & phrase or used unproven verbage. ie.,...... victim.
What was discovered is the tiny spot of blood found on a pair of Michael's drawers which is suspected to be from an injection for his skin condition and the cocaine found in the same location are false. There was no cocaine in MJ's blood and the cocaine found on the pant HAD NOT BEEN DIGESTED......UNDILUTED. (All those with investigative skills and it took a bunch of laypersons to see this, know the difference? Suspect something wrong with the picture???)
What some may not know is all the items seized during the 93 raid of Neverland were not returned to Michael after the investigation was closed....and it was regardless to what both DA's mouthed for the press. Nor was Michael and his attorneys ever given an inventory not even a list of items taken. All this material was supposedly stored for 10 yrs and then used as part of the "prior bad acts" evidence during the Grand Jury & attempted to use during the 05 trial. Doc: #2.
When you have time and please find time to read: http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/
A) DIRTY LINEN in Michael’s home and common UNDERSTANDING of the need to find it there
[img]file:///C:/Users/Sharon/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif[/img] Dirty laundry in Michael’s home. IT WAS A SET-UP
SB Court Doc
#1: Notice of Motion and Motion in Limine to Exclude Fourteen (14) items of irrelevant evidence (Jan 18, 05)
www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/01 ... texc14.pdf
#2: Notion of Motion and Motion to dismiss for outrageous Govt conduct. (Dec 13, 04)
www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/12 ... ssgovt.pdf
With Much Love,