Autopsy photo was NOT needed

How do you feel about Michael Jackson? Got any info you want to share?

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
Saphster
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 7:23 pm
Contact:

Autopsy photo was NOT needed

Post by Saphster » Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:55 pm

Okay so I just saw the photo. Yes that one. I looked it up. I knew I would pop into it sooner or later so best to be done with it now than be surprised. It was not as horrible as I thought it would be...but it was still horrible. Was it really necessary to show this picture to the court room? What? To prove that he was thin and in bad shape, or to prove that he was in good shape? To show off bruises? Or to show there were not many bruises?

I just don't get it. No other celebrity has had their autopsy photo shown. Well, I have seen TuPac's photo. But that was only because many people thought he faked his death and gone to another country. That's the only reason his is still out there on the internet.

But, was it really nessecary to have Michael's photo let out? How much more do they want to embarass this man? He is dead already. Why bother him even more?? I'll describe it...they pretty much took it hours after he died. He is just lying there stripped down naked. That's right. Naked. Why show his dead naked body to the court and eventually leaked to the WORLD?? WHAT THE f-ck man?! They didn't do this to Anna Nicole Smith!!!

This photo should have been kept private. Only hospitals, court rooms, and authorities should be allowed to see. Some dick probably released it to the public.

I am so ANGRY. SO ANGRY!

I was learning to let all this go. But this $hit right here did it for me. Now, I'm definitely ticked OFF!!! Trying to live by Michael's example but i can't anymore. Now my screws have gone loose!!!!!!!!!!!!
Image



\\\"My fans are still there. They still love me. They\\\'re alive.\\\" -Michael Jackson.

MJfan01'
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 5526
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:08 am
Contact:

Autopsy photo was NOT needed

Post by MJfan01' » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:40 pm

I agree, I think it was in bad taste
Image

Dialdancer
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:24 pm

Autopsy photo was NOT needed

Post by Dialdancer » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:02 pm

No it was not needed. I believe it was done as a shock tactic for which as far as the Prosecution is concern did not work. Understand I am never blah-zay about disrespect to Michael, but if they intended to swing the jurors sympathies with it, they used it too early. There should have been no need to relie on emotion just the evidence. It backfired, the amount of ire and complaints lodged against the Prosecution team and Judge was large.

User avatar
LittleSusie50
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 867
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:35 am

Autopsy photo was NOT needed

Post by LittleSusie50 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:30 pm

Nothing surprises me any more.
I now know that people are capable of ANYTHING.
There are no boundaries, especially when it comes to celebrities.
I can understand why people would be angry, but it didn't bother me.
Doesn't make it right to show it, but it didn't bother me
because I pretty much expected them to act like damn fools in this case.

Michael is gone.
Whatever they do now pales in comparison.
Yes, it was not necessary.
Disrespectful to say the least.
But they disrespected him on a daily basis when he was alive.
Why would they stop now? <_<
Image

When I'm good I'm bad, and when I'm bad, I'm better...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests