Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

How do you feel about Michael Jackson? Got any info you want to share?

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:46 pm

from snow88star


Defence) Supplemental brief in support of motion to traverse affidavits, to quash warrants, and to suppress evidence(according to the defence)...

* Unless the defence are provided with certified copies of the search warrants, all searches should be treated as "warrantless."

* Detective Zelis inappropriately omitted from a prosecution motion Stan Katz' opinion that MJ is not a pedophile.

* Detective Zelis claims to be an expert on pedophiles, but there is no evidence anywhere to indicate that he has any experience in molestation cases -- Zelis provided a "foundationless pedophile profile" in the affidavit to search Neverland.

* Sheriffs conducted illegal searches in areas they did not have warrants to search.

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:47 pm

Awaiting court filings:

Please be advised that at 2:15 PM PDT on AUGUST 13, 2004,
the Superior Court posted the following documents on its
special media website:

* Notice of Default


* Notice of Media Requests


* Order on Media Request to Permit Coverage
<

* Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion to Traverse
Affidavits, to Quash Warrants and to Suppress Evidence
Under Penal Code § 1538.5; Declaration of Robert M.
Sanger; Memorandum of Points and Authorities

* Ex Parte Application to File Under

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:05 pm

more from snow88star

The Bank of America was supposed to provide documents of MJs accounts between and including the dates 1 Feb. 2003 - 31 April 2003, but, interestingly, the bank provided documents that were not within that time frame. Hmm, rather suspicious!

privacy
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by privacy » Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:29 pm

more from snow88star

The Bank of America was supposed to provide documents of MJs accounts between and including the dates 1 Feb. 2003 - 31 April 2003, but, interestingly, the bank provided documents that were not within that time frame. Hmm, rather suspicious!
That's really odd! Why would they not do that? Or why would Snedface make it seem he needed those dates and not the ones he was given.. ?

im so confused.
[align=center]Image



I knew I'd love you like I do[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:38 pm

Exparte Application to File Under Seal

http://www.mjjforum.com/main/index.php? ... ecatid=259

Notice of Default

http://www.mjjforum.com/main/index.php? ... ecatid=260

Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion to Traverrse Affidavits, to Quash Warrants and to Suppress Evidence Under Penal Code 1538.5

http://www.mjjforum.com/main/index.php? ... ecatid=261


Notice of Media Requests

http://www.mjjforum.com/main/index.php? ... ecatid=262

Order on Media Request to Permit Coverage

http://www.mjjforum.com/main/index.php? ... ecatid=263

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:10 pm

Please be advised that at 4:30 PM PDT on AUGUST 13, 2004,
the Superior Court posted the following documents on its
special media website:

* Order that Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to
Defendant's Motion to Traverse Affidavits, to Quash
Warrants and to Suppress Evidence and Accompanying
Documents be Filed Under Seal

* Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to
Traverse Affidavits, to Quash Warrants and to Suppress
Evidence; Declaration of Robert M. Sanger (redacted)
>

* Access Proponents' Memorandum of Points and Authorities
in Support of Rule 980 Media Request to Photograph,
Record, or Broadcast August 16, 2004 Hearing


* Notice of Mr. Jackson's Non-Opposition to Access
Proponents' Rule 980 Media Requests to Photograph, Record,
or Broadcast August 16, 2004 Hearing


* Order that Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion
to Traverse Affidavits, etc. be Maintained Under Seal
Pending Further Order of Court

* Ex Parte Application to File Under Seal


* Plaintiff's Notice of Motion for Order Directing that
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Traverse
Affidavits, etc. be Maintained Under Seal Until Further
Order of Court; Declaration of Gerald McC. Franklin in
Support of Sealing; Memorandum of Points and Authorities

* Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Traverse
Affidavits, to Quash Warrants and to Suppress Evidence
(Pen. Code, §1538.5) (redacted)

* Order that Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion to
Traverse Affidavits, to Quash Search Warrants and to
Suppress Evidence Under Penal Code Section 1538.5 and
Accompanying Documents be Filed Under Seal

(currently awaiting links to this info...)

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:10 pm

Please be advised that at 5:00 PM PDT on AUGUST 13, 2004,
the Superior Court posted the following documents on its
special media website:

* Order Authorizing Sealing of Motion to Authorize Release
of Attorney General's Conclusions Regarding Its
Investigation into Defendant's Allegations of Mistreatment

at the Santa Barbara County Jail



* Notice of Motion and Motion of Jim Anderson, Santa
Barbara County Sheriff, for Authorization (redacted)


* Application of Jim Anderson, Sheriff, County of Santa
Barbara that Motion be Filed Under Seal (redacted)
<

(currently awaiting download links...)



:2thinking


dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by dangerous » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:35 pm

Originally posted by privacy
That's really odd! Why would they not do that? Or why would Snedface make it seem he needed those dates and not the ones he was given.. ?

im so confused.
Its just his attempt to gain as much insight into Michael's finanical status as possible. I dont think any mistakes were made.

EDIT: I just read the acutal motion, and it says that the Bank of America was supposed to provide documents within that set time frame, however there was ZERO activity during those suggested dates. So INSTEAD, they gave them information OUTSIDE the requested time, for no good reason...
[align=center]Image[/align]

HeavenSent
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 10007
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by HeavenSent » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:38 pm

I can't wait to read those filings. My mind's going 100 miles a minute.
Order Authorizing Sealing of Motion to Authorize Release
of Attorney General's Conclusions Regarding Its
Investigation into Defendant's Allegations of Mistreatment
at the Santa Barbara County Jail
WE WANT TO KNOW THE AG'S RULING ON THIS!! Damn, I'm nervous.
[align=center]Image[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:39 pm

This is from MsTenda, who is uploading the documents, 9 of them, as we speak:

Posted: Aug 13 2004, 07:34 PM
The documents are being uploaded as we speak. 9 of them total.

Also there is a SMOKIN' document in one of the case filings - Michael's non opposition to having the hearing on Aug 16th televised.... It looks like Michael wants the media IN the courthouse!!

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by dangerous » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:40 pm

Originally posted by whisper

Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion to Traverrse Affidavits, to Quash Warrants and to Suppress Evidence Under Penal Code 1538.5
http://www.mjjforum.com/main/index.php? ... ecatid=261

Whats interesting in this one is how they used Zelis' mythical credentials to get search warrants signed. Those sons of bitches.
[align=center]Image[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:44 pm

This is from another member at MJJF:
harveysond Posted: Aug 13 2004, 07:37 PM

just read the latest court filings. will be argued at 8.30 am on august 19th.
Anderson does not want to violate the protective order and therefore seeks the courts I believe counsel. His filing starts with a transcript of the CBS interview with bradley. Then it goes on to state that he and his department took tghe allegations seriously and called for the AG to investigate because of potential civil lawsuit action.
:2thinking

HeavenSent
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 10007
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by HeavenSent » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:44 pm

Originally posted by whisper
This is from MsTenda, who is uploading the documents, 9 of them, as we speak:

Posted: Aug 13 2004, 07:34 PM

It looks like Michael wants the media IN the courthouse!!

:saywhatsa DAYUM!
[align=center]Image[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Court Updates!! Aug 13 - Illegal searches, Atty Gen. Conclusion?, ETC

Post by whisper » Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:45 pm

more
harveysond Posted: Aug 13 2004, 07:43 PM
Yeah michael supports the media '980' rule request. Apparently public broadcast is vital to for the inquiry to into an elected public offical's blantent disregard for a citizen's rights and general participation in outragous government conduct.

If this is approved then Sneddon's vendetta will be exposed to the world which DD wouldn't even be able to spin

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests