November 4th Hearing Thread

The"official" threads posted during the trial

Moderator: Global Moderator

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by dangerous » Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:25 am

Today:

Bail hearing
Hearing on Evvy's raid
Motion for DA's recusal


Should be fun. :bs
[align=center]Image[/align]

Tiger Lilly
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by Tiger Lilly » Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:35 am

Why not skip ahead to the Appeal's court right now, save us all alot of time. :careless

A.Beautiful.Mind
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:00 pm

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by A.Beautiful.Mind » Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:52 am

I hope everything turns out okay today.. I supposse that asking for too much though. I'm not feeling that optimistic about this hearing today, I fear that the request from the state's office will influence the Judges decision too much and it may result in denying the motions which have been put foward towards him. *Fingers Crossed*

~Jamie~
[align=center]

Michael Jackson
[/align]



[align=center]Planet Earth, gentle and blue

With all my heart, I love you.[/align]



[align=center]I LOVE YOU[/align]





[align=center]Justice has Prevailed



http://insideabeautifulmind.blogspot.com/[/align]


Tiger Lilly
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by Tiger Lilly » Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:54 am

[quote]Originally posted by *Ã

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by dangerous » Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:31 pm

ohohh they want that tape BAD. I like it :D
[align=center]Image[/align]

Tiger Lilly
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by Tiger Lilly » Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:34 pm

Originally posted by dangerous
ohohh they want that tape BAD. I like it :D
Ashely (or anyone), can you explain to me about this tape. I don't really get it. :smacking

Michael Jackson's Kougra
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by Michael Jackson's Kougra » Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:37 pm

yeah!!! ***what Gem said***
[align=center].:*Fran*:.[/align][align=center][/align]

[align=center]Thanx for the blend Neicie :)[/align]

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by dangerous » Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:51 pm

There are 2 tapes the BM tape and this tape (tape2). The prosecution wants both, they were given a PARTIAL COPY of the BM tape, they want the whole thing, the defense said no, wait until 30days before trial. The defense showed the prosecution that they only have a piece of the tape at the trial when they played parts of it the prosecution never heard before. (I hope im correct, my memory is kinda hazy) The prosecution keeps brining up the “Sanchez” motion because that motion is what compels the defense to hand over inculpatory evidence (evidence that proves MJ commit the crime) Melville denied there motion and said he believes Mez knows the law. Mez says he isn’t hiding anything and that there is no inculpatory evidence but the prosecution thinks those tapes are.

The defense came in possession of tape2 which apparently:
is, perhaps self-evidently, the product of Mr. (blank)'s commission of the crime of secretly recording a telephone conversation without Mrs. (blank)'s knowledge or permission on behalf of Michael Jackson
So the defense, for their own reasons, (they weren’t compelled to or anything) gave them a copy of the tape2 and now the prosecution wants to know where it came from, saying that it could possibly be the omission of one of the UNINDICTED coconspirators admitting to false imprison, extort, bla bla blah

i hope that made sense, i was kinda rushin and ive read so many motions ive confused myself
[align=center]Image[/align]

User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9130
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by whisper » Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:56 pm

You can tape someone who is talking about committing a crime without their knowlege. So Franklin's full of $hit with that motion.

I suspect this mother was secretly recorded making threats against Michael or talking about committing fraud, lying, threats and/or extortion. And prosecutors are just trying to turn the issue around. No way the defense would worry about anyone giving them any tape if that tape isn't very very telling about these people.

mjlovergurl
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:02 pm
Contact:

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by mjlovergurl » Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:01 pm

is this tape good or bad for micheal's sake? im confused! lol





HeavenSent
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 10007
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by HeavenSent » Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:32 pm

Oh :censored: I'm slipping. I totally forgot about today.
I suspect this mother was secretly recorded making threats against Michael or talking about committing fraud, lying, threats and/or extortion. And prosecutors are just trying to turn the issue around. No way the defense would worry about anyone giving them any tape if that tape isn't very very telling about these people.
Exactly.
[align=center]Image[/align]

~Vicky~

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by ~Vicky~ » Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:41 pm

Originally posted by mjlovergurl
is this tape good or bad for micheal's sake? im confused! lol
Why not read the thread and find out?






This whole thing is getting me mad. How can the AG take over when he filed a motion opposing to do so? It won't happen.

Fuc.king hypocrites, this whole thing. This is how innocent people get in jail.

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by dangerous » Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:42 pm

How can the AG take over when he filed a motion opposing to do so
he wont.. a special prosecutor would be called in i think.
[align=center]Image[/align]

~Vicky~

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by ~Vicky~ » Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:51 pm

So many damn delays. Michael will be 80 by the time he is tried.

How many motions for the defense has that fu.ck of a judge actually granted? I am so irritated right now..I've just ruined my day.

dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

November 4th Hearing Thread

Post by dangerous » Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:53 pm

fu.ck of a judge

LMAO.

Very few, the "law" is agaisnt Michael very much right now. We'll have to wait for some appeals decisions to see where we are.
[align=center]Image[/align]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests