Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Articles related to info from 1993. Also include follow up articles and further information from later dates.

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
whisper
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9123
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by whisper » Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:17 pm

Photos may contradict Michael's accuser
USA TODAY (pre-1997 Fulltext). McLean, Va.: Jan 28, 1994. pg. 02.D

Section: LIFE
ISSN/ISBN: 07347456
Text Word Count 106


Abstract:
The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

Full Text:
Copyright USA Today Information Network Jan 28, 1994

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

If so, this could weaken any possible criminal actions against the singer. Already, speculation that the 14-year-old boy may not be willing to cooperate with officials is swirling.

The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

Lawyers for both sides could not be reached for comment Thursday.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/USAToday/55 ... 7s+accuser

2Dangerous4MJ
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 372
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:49 am

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by 2Dangerous4MJ » Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:29 pm

YEA-UH! That liar.
JUSTICE has been served!






dangerous
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 am

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by dangerous » Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:06 am

MAY contradict? HAHHAHA. They absolutley 100% undoubtedly contradicted!!!! They dont need JC to testify if the kid can depict MJ's wee wee. Morons. :onesided:
[align=center]Image[/align]

MJ_FAN_FOR_LIFE733
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 1:00 pm

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by MJ_FAN_FOR_LIFE733 » Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:18 pm

Originally posted by whisper
Photos may contradict Michael's accuser
USA TODAY (pre-1997 Fulltext). McLean, Va.: Jan 28, 1994. pg. 02.D

Section: LIFE
ISSN/ISBN: 07347456
Text Word Count 106


Abstract:
The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.

Full Text:
Copyright USA Today Information Network Jan 28, 1994

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

If so, this could weaken any possible criminal actions against the singer. Already, speculation that the 14-year-old boy may not be willing to cooperate with officials is swirling.

The boy's civil suit was settled out of court this week. The boy's lawyers say the settlement does not preclude the teen from testifying in a criminal case, though prosecutors cannot force him to testify against his will.


That bastard! He can burn in hell for all I care!!!!!!!!

~Kelly M. Abbott~
Image



The Angel of Innocence :heart2:

frozen rose
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 4117
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:53 pm
Contact:

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by frozen rose » Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:21 pm

well at least we got some good news out of it:
An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.


this is great news.
[align=center]Image



Image



Image



Johnny Depp. Anime/Manga. Michael Jackson <3[/align]

hot4uMichael
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2624
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by hot4uMichael » Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:56 am

thanks for posting.... of course nothing can be said because there are no evidence on that Michael did this... only his porno magazine but those are printed long after the family left neverland for good.... god
[align=center]Image

Aqui muy excellente favorito



\\\\\\\"Handcuffing Michael, is like handcuffing us and the entire black community\\\\\\\" - Jermaine Jackson on BET Special Show[/align]



Name: Cindy

Age: 20

Location: Sweden

Occupation: Student

DirtyDiana87
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2666
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:00 pm
Contact:

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by DirtyDiana87 » Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:25 am

Thanks Whisper. :)

Heather~
Image





Thank you so much Pam for my beautiful avatar & Blend!! I love them so much!!



Image



Thank you Sarah for the beautiful blend!!! I LOVE it!!!

Dialdancer
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:24 pm

Photos may contradict Michael\'s accuser (Jan 28 1994) - USA Today

Post by Dialdancer » Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:43 pm

Copyright USA Today Information Network Jan 28, 1994

An unidentified source told Reuters news service Thursday that photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.

If so, this could weaken any possible criminal actions against the singer. Already, speculation that the 14-year-old boy may not be willing to cooperate with officials is swirling.

It is too bad the Media could find those balls they pretended to own and report this right.

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!........Jackson accuser could not identify Jackson as previously reported by the SB DA's Office. Jackson's young accuser was way off the mark, his drawing and the photos prove he could not have seen the entertainer in any state of undress. And what of the civil suit and Jackson's claim of extortion? Will there be a criminal investigation of the father who reported the alleged molestation, but who refuses to cooperate with Police in their molestation investigation?

[align=center]NOW THAT'S HOW THE STORIES SHOULD HAVE READ[/align]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests