AEG Lawyer Testifies That Company Paid Conrad Murray $150,000 A Month

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
By Ryan Book, The Music Times
Aug 09, 2013 02:53 PM EDT

In a telling piece of testimony, a lawyer who represented AEG when a contract was drawn up for Conrad Murray, the doctor held responsible for manslaughter in the case of pop star Michael Jackson's death, testified on behalf of the defense at the Jackson family's case against AEG.

Kathy Jorrie was reportedly involved in the contractual negotiations with Murray. Regardless of what Jorrie testified, the Jacksons have accused AEG of negligently hiring Murray, while the company has denied having a role in the hiring. Whether that will change due to this testimony remains unseen.

Jorrie testified that Murray told her he was leaving four clinics that brought in more than a million dollars each in order to work for Jackson.

Testimony at Murray's trial concluded that he ran only two clinics, and his Las Vegas location was more than $1 million in debt. Perhaps that's why Murray was asking for nearly $1 million a month to care for Jackson.

When he settled for $150,000 a month, he was still being paid far more than anyone else in Jackson's employ and anyone associated with the "This Is It" concert series.

Even at the "discounted" rate, the contract with AEG created a conflict of interest for the doctor, according to David Berman, an entertainment attorney and former head of Capitol Records.

The contract supposedly indicated that AEG could cancel it at any time. Therefore if the "This Is It" series were to be cancelled, Murray would likely be fired as a result. So if all the testimony up to this point in the trial has been accurate, Jackson may have been far too weak to perform, but Murray was pushing him using unhealthy methods, such as nightly propofol treatments, in order to protect the doctor's own interests. Berman implied that this would prove hiring negligence on the part of AEG.

The trial is now in its fifteenth week, and is expected to continue on into September...

Source: http://www.musictimes.com/articles/786/20130809/michael-jackson-trial-aeg-lawyer-testifies-company-paid-conrad-murray.htm
 

Dialdancer

New member
Many Fans are of an absolute belief this trial is a done deal.  After what I witnessed in the Zimmerman case and what I see as another bias judge in a MJ civil suit I am not so sure.  The Judge will set the limits of what can and cannot be looked at when the jury makes their decision. I do not expect her to be a part of the Fanbase, but many of her rulings have been inordinately favorable to the Defense and she is beginning to show hostility toward Plaintiff attorneys.
 

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
...another asshole judge. shocked. not. Whatever the result of this trial is, at the very least we know AEG's fingers were all over this whole situation.  They claimed they had absolutely nothing to do Conrad Murray and barely knew he was.

AEG execs could have a very public, painful future because people who are money-focused with super-deep pockets really don't like any form of negative publicity regardless of the circumstances.

Imagine being a potential investor or shareholder and hearing the company you're investing in put a convicted murderer (Conrad Murray) on the payroll... for WHATEVER reason.
 

Dialdancer

New member
whisper said:
...another asshole judge. shocked. not. Whatever the result of this trial is, at the very least we know AEG's fingers were all over this whole situation.  They claimed they had absolutely nothing to do Conrad Murray and barely knew he was.

AEG execs could have a very public, painful future because people who are money-focused with super-deep pockets really don't like any form of negative publicity regardless of the circumstances.

Imagine being a potential investor or shareholder and hearing the company you're investing in put a convicted murderer (Conrad Murray) on the payroll... for WHATEVER reason.


Yeah hip deep is right.  Now she keep talking about killing trial every chance she gets.  AEG today wants a dismissal, because their paid for "sports medicine" doctor says no conflict of interest AFTER their own attorney testified it was.  Legal contract = Lawyer + Doctor ..... and Doctor to win????
 
Top