I believe this is where Sneddon has fit in the "stolen furniture" accusations. The law says "extortion is the obtaining of property from another..." So Sneddon is going to claim that Michael illegally obtained the family's furniture. Of all of the charges, I think this one is the one that concerns me most because it does seem that Michael ended up with the family's furniture somehow. I don't know enough of what happened with the furniture to figure out how they'll defend against this charge yet, but I'm sure there is a reasonable defense against it. Just because you have someone's furniture doesn't mean you obtained it illegally. I suspect the furniture was obtained as part of the process of moving the mother to a new home, but I believe the mother was agreeable to having Michael move her. The only disagreement was that Michael wasn't buying her a fancy new house, but got her an apartment instead.
I suspect the furniture was obtained as part of the process of moving the mother to a new home, but I believe the mother was agreeable to having Michael move her.
Originally posted by *Ã
Originally posted by Tiger Lilly
I'm confident they do have a good explanation, one thats the truth. Me, Jen and Sarah have been discussing this on MSN. I mean y'all heard their explanation to the crappy conspiracy theory. We all know Michael never stole their stuff so the defense have an explanation!
Originally posted by *Ã
Originally posted by Tiger Lilly
Indeedy Jamie! I mean already we've seen so many cracks - if not gaping craters - in this "case". I agree they are trying to pile on the charges in hope of getting away with something. But Michael and his team are too god for that. I have every faith in them and I know Michael does too.
Yup! And a recent mistake by the prosecutors has led to Sneddon having to testify. That's just ONE mistake, but a big one none the less. They can't be that on the ball! We've also heard about Sneddon's hissy fits. How "mature" and "professional" can that man be, esp if his "case" is as solid as he claims it is? :laugh We've also heard that Sneddon has hyped up his cases in the past by lying about the amount of "evidence" he has. "The evidence will speak for itself" BS! More like the lack of evidence!They have made so many mistakes during these past few months, and we have seen so because of the feedback which we recieve about the hearing which have taken place.
Originally posted by Tiger Lilly
Yup! And a recent mistake by the prosecutors has led to Sneddon having to testify. That's just ONE mistake, but a big one none the less. They can't be that on the ball! We've also heard about Sneddon's hissy fits. How "mature" and "professional" can that man be, esp if his "case" is as solid as he claims it is? :laugh We've also heard that Sneddon has hyped up his cases in the past by lying about the amount of "evidence" he has. "The evidence will speak for itself" BS! More like the lack of evidence!