Cross-examinations of Bob Jones + Stacy Brown (April 11 2005)

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
5540
5 CROSS-EXAMINATION
6 BY MR. MESEREAU:
7 Q. Good morning, Mr. Jones.
8 A. Good morning.
9 Q. My name is Tom Mesereau and I speak for
10 Michael Jackson.
11 A. Sure.
12 Q. We haven't met before, right?
13 A. No.
14 Q. Okay. The prosecutor referred to an
15 interview that you had with Sergeant Steve Robel and
16 another officer on April 7th, 2005.
17 A. Uh-huh.
18 Q. Do you remember that?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. And do you remember you were asked by an
21 officer, "Um, did you see Mr Jackson engage in any
22 head licking in the World Music Awards?" And your
23 answer was, "No, no, no," right?
24 A. Uh-huh.
25 Q. And then you were asked, "Um, did you see
26 Mr. Jackson engage in any head licking of anybody?"
27 And your answer was, "Never." Remember that?
28 A. I recall.



5541
1 Q. Okay. And what you were not -- when you
2 were dealing with your co-writer and publisher, you
3 were not under oath, were you?
4 A. No.
5 Q. And of course today you are, right?
6 A. Yes.

7 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; argumentative.
8 THE COURT: Overruled. Next question. He
9 answered that.
10 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: The reality is, Mr. Jones,
11 you have repeatedly said you don't recall seeing
12 head licking on the plane, right?
13 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; misstates the
14 evidence.
15 THE COURT: Sustained.
16 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: You don't recall seeing
17 head licking by Michael on the plane with Jordie, do
18 you?
19 A. I said it, but it was in the -- it appeared
20 in an e-mail. I said I did not recall seeing it,
21 but it -- apparently so, because it appeared in an
22 e-mail that came from my machine.
23 Q. Well, in response to the prosecutor's
24 questions, you said you had reservations about that
25 statement --
26 A. Yes.
27 Q. -- correct?
28 And what are your reservations about that



5542
1 statement?
2 A. That I just don't recall exactly seeing
3 that. I truly don't.
4 Q. And would you agree when you're working with
5 a co-writer and a publisher to prepare a book about
6 Michael Jackson, there's pressure to make things
7 sensational when you can, right?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. And your publisher and others want a book
10 that can sell, correct?
11 A. My co-writer. The publisher wasn't involved
12 in that particular end of it.
13 Q. Okay. And certainly, having worked with
14 Michael all those years, you've seen numerous
15 attempts by numerous people to sensationalize
16 aspects of Michael's life, right?
17 A. Correct.

18 Q. And if you're writing a book about Michael,
19 there certainly is always a temptation to
20 sensationalize if you don't watch yourself, right?
21 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; argumentative.
22 THE COURT: Sustained.
23 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: How is the book being
24 written?
25 A. Well, I don't quite understand what
26 you're --
27 Q. Let me rephrase it. It's probably a poor
28 question.



5543
1 You have a co-writer?
2 A. That's correct.
3 Q. Did your co-writer ever work for Michael
4 Jackson?
5 A. No, but my co-writer knows the family.
6 Q. Okay. And you're both trying to prepare a
7 book about your observations and experiences in the
8 past, right?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. And the prosecutor asked you some questions
11 about what stage it's in, right?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And is there considerably more editing
14 required?
15 A. Most definitely.
16 Q. And is it a long ways from being published
17 as far as you're concerned?
18 A. As far as I am concerned, and I'm supposed
19 to have final approval.
20 Q. And when you have a co-writer on a book like
21 that -- actually, let me make it more direct.
22 Does your co-writer have responsibility for
23 preparing drafts that you have to then review for
24 accuracy?
25 A. That is correct.
26 Q. Okay. And is it -- would it be appropriate
27 to say that what the prosecutor showed you has not
28 been approved for accuracy?



5544
1 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I'm going to object to any
2 further leading of this particular witness, Your
3 Honor.
4 THE COURT: Overruled.
5 You may answer. Do you want the question
6 read back?
7 THE WITNESS: Would you repeat the question,
8 please?
9 THE COURT: I'll have the court reporter read
10 it back.
11 (Record read.)
12 THE COURT: Are you talking about Exhibit
13 803, Counsel, or not?
14 MR. MESEREAU: Yes, Your Honor.
15 THE COURT: You need to show it to him,
16 because he's been shown three exhibits.
17 MR. MESEREAU: I don't know -- are the
18 exhibits in front of you, Mr. Jones?
19 THE WITNESS: Exhibits? I don't have
20 anything.
21 THE COURT: They're not up there.
22 MR. MESEREAU: May I approach, Your Honor?
23 THE COURT: You may.
24 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Mr. Jones, I'm showing you
25 what has been marked as Exhibit No. 803, okay? Do
26 you see that?
27 A. Uh-huh.
28 Q. That starts off with a title that you said



5545
1 is not accurate and has not been approved, correct?
2 A. That is correct.
3 Q. And you told the prosecutor you had written
4 the words at the bottom of the page that refer to
5 licking, right?
6 A. Uh-huh.
7 Q. And is it your testimony that you have not
8 approved the accuracy of that statement?
9 A. That is correct.

10 Q. Okay. Now, the prosecutor showed you an
11 e-mail that you indicated you think you sent; is
12 that correct?
13 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; misstates the
14 evidence.
15 THE COURT: Overruled.
16 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you see that?
17 A. Personally I don't think this is in the
18 book, this statement.
19 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I'll object as
20 nonresponsive.
21 THE COURT: I guess it's without -- his
22 answer shows me it's without foundation. So do you
23 want to ask a foundational question on that?
24 MR. MESEREAU: Yes.
25 Q. Mr. -- well, let me just show you. I'm
26 looking now at Exhibit 805, okay? And that's the
27 e-mail the prosecutor referred to.
28 A. Uh-huh.



5546
1 Q. And I think you said you believe you sent
2 the e-mail; is that right?
3 A. Uh-huh.
4 Q. And are the words in that e-mail accurate as
5 far as you're concerned?
6 A. Perhaps they are.
7 Q. You don't know?
8 A. Because I wrote -- if it came from my e-mail
9 address, I had to write it.
10 Q. Okay. And -- but you don't know for sure?
11 A. No.
12 Q. And are the words on that e-mail words you
13 intend to include in your book?
14 A. Not like that. My -- my co-writer is
15 handling that, and I have tried to change certain
16 things in the way things were said on numerous
17 occasions with him.

18 Q. Would it be accurate to say that neither
19 Exhibit 803 nor Exhibit 805 are accurate as far as
20 you're concerned?
21 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; misstates the
22 evidence --
23 THE COURT: Overruled.
24 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: -- as far as to 803.
25 THE COURT: Overruled.
26 You may answer.
27 THE WITNESS: Well, I don't know which
28 one -- you got three different things there, don't



5547
1 you?
2 MR. MESEREAU: Sure.
3 May I approach, Your Honor?
4 THE COURT: Yeah.
5 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Showing you Exhibit 803
6 and Exhibit 805, okay?
7 A. This is three. This is five.
8 Q. Yes. Okay? Let's talk about 803. You've
9 already indicated the title -- what purports to be
10 the title is not going to be the title of your book,
11 right?
12 A. That's correct.
13 Q. And you've already indicated that the bottom
14 paragraph that you say you wrote is not accurate; is
15 that correct?
16 A. Uh-huh. This I wrote.
17 Q. Yes.
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. But you're indicating it's not accurate,
20 true?
21 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; misstates the
22 evidence.
23 THE COURT: Overruled.
24 You may answer.
25 THE WITNESS: Not completely true as far as
26 I'm concerned.
27 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Okay. Let's look at the
28 next exhibit, which is Exhibit No. 805. Do you see



5548
1 that?
2 A. Yes. This -- this one is true. I'm sorry.
3 Yes. I'm sorry.
4 Q. And you wrote that e-mail, correct?
5 A. Yes. Yes.
6 Q. And what you said in the e-mail was, in
7 summary, that you might -- and correct me if I'm
8 wrong, that you thought your knowledge of the
9 Chandlers might be an insurance policy for you?
10 A. Uh-huh.
11 Q. Correct?
12 A. Uh-huh.
13 Q. An insurance policy of employment, right?
14 A. Uh-huh.

15 Q. And what that means is, "I might try and
16 hold over Michael's head what I could say about the
17 Chandlers," right?

18 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I'm going to object to
19 counsel ascribing any meaning to those words.
20 THE COURT: Sustained.
21 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: What did you mean by
22 "insurance policy of employment"?
23 A. Well, I was not -- I did not have a
24 confidentiality agreement.
25 Q. Okay.
26 A. That's what I -- that's what I basically
27 meant.
28 Q. And did you also mean that, "Because I've



5549
1 spent all these years with Michael, that I could
2 almost use as a threat writing an expose of him if
3 I'm not employed by him"?
4 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Same objection. And
5 argumentative.
6 THE COURT: Overruled.
7 You may answer.
8 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Is that sort of what it
9 means?
10 A. No, not really, because I have never -- I
11 have never sued, I have never sold stories. I have
12 never -- in the 16 and a half years, I've never
13 attempted to extort in any manner.
14 Q. And I'm not saying you did. I'm just asking
15 you --
16 A. No, no, I did not mean it in that respect.
17 Q. Okay. Now, when did you say your work was
18 terminated?
19 A. June 9th, 2004.
20 Q. Okay. And where was your office at the
21 time?
22 A. In my home.
23 Q. You indicated in response to the
24 prosecutor's question that you didn't see Michael
25 very often, right?
26 A. No.
27 Q. And why was that?
28 A. This was -- this was Michael Jackson's modus



5550
1 operandi from the very beginning. I saw Michael
2 mostly if we were on a tour that my presence -- if I
3 may explain. I have worked in the entertainment
4 industry prior to working with Michael Jackson for
5 17 and a half years, and I know familiarity breeds
6 contempt. And the further you stay away from
7 artists, the better off you are.
8 Q. And for that reason, did you not go to
9 Neverland very much?
10 A. I went to Neverland when I brought groups
11 up, such as the Challengers Boys & Girls Club. Such
12 as the First AME Church, et cetera. I was not a
13 regular visitor at Neverland at all.
14 Q. Now, who was the first group that you
15 mentioned that you brought?
16 A. The Challengers Boys --
17 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Relevance;
18 beyond the scope.
19 THE COURT: Sustained.
20 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: In a typical year, while
21 you were employed, how often would you visit
22 Neverland?
23 A. I haven't been to Neverland in years. My
24 visits to Neverland were on a more frequent basis
25 about five years ago when I was able to get groups
26 approved to go to Neverland.
27 Q. Okay. And you had an office located where?
28 A. Before we closed the offices, we were at



5551
1 9255 Sunset Boulevard.
2 Q. Okay. And how many years did you spend in
3 that office?
4 A. I think we were there approximately ten
5 years, I think. I cannot be for certain.
6 Q. Okay. Now, you indicated at the music
7 awards, the World Music Awards, that at one point
8 you saw Jordie on Michael Jackson's lap and his
9 sister on Michael Jackson's lap together, right?
10 A. That is correct.
11 Q. Okay. And where was Michael Jackson sitting
12 in that event?
13 A. He was seated on the front row next to
14 Prince Albert of Monaco, and -- on one side, and
15 Linda Evans, the actress, on the other side.
16 And I attempted to get -- I had arranged for
17 the Chandlers to sit directly behind Mr. Jackson,
18 because I did not feel that the royalty wanted to be
19 bothered with those guests. But he insisted that
20 they sit with him, so I left it alone.
21 Q. Did the mother sit with Michael Jackson as
22 well?
23 A. Behind.
24 Q. Okay. So when you saw the brother and
25 sister sitting on Michael Jackson's lap in the first
26 row, the mother was right behind, correct?
27 A. Correct.
28 Q. So this is the first row in full view of



5552
1 everyone at the awards show, correct?
2 A. That is correct.
3 Q. There was no effort to hide anything at any
4 time?
5 A. No.
6 Q. At some point, did you see the children with
7 their mother behind where Michael Jackson was
8 sitting?
9 A. When I brought them in to their seats, they
10 were seated behind Mr. Jackson. Mr. Jackson moved
11 them up front.
12 Q. Okay. Did -- when you say he moved them up
13 front, did he move them into seats up front?
14 A. He moved them into his seat.
15 Q. Okay. Okay. So the children moved into his
16 seat to sit with him?
17 A. With him.
18 Q. And the mother still stayed sitting behind?
19 A. That is correct.
20 Q. And at some point did you see the children
21 go back with their mother or did they always stay
22 with Michael?
23 A. No, they stayed up there.
24 Q. And I think at one point you saw Jordie
25 still sitting on Michael's lap, and Jordie's sister
26 sitting on Linda Evans' lap?
27 A. That is correct.
28 Q. Please tell the jury what the World Music



5553
1 Awards show is.
2 A. The World Music Awards show is a show that's
3 given annually in Monte Carlo for the best record
4 sales in -- the best worldwide record sales.
5 I had arranged for Mr. Jackson to be honored
6 by the World Music Awards, and -- because of his
7 record sales. And we had gone there for that
8 particular purpose, for him to be honored by the
9 World Music Awards. And to be seen around the
10 world. And I attempted, because perception is 90
11 percent of what the public thinks, to get those
12 people off of his lap.
13 Q. Did the Chandler family seem to remain
14 during the entire show sitting with Michael?
15 A. Oh, of course. Yes.
16 Q. Okay. Now, you -- how did you get to
17 Monaco?
18 A. We flew.
19 Q. Did you -- fly from where?
20 A. Los Angeles.
21 Q. Okay. And were there other stops on that
22 trip?
23 A. To Paris. We flew from Los Angeles to
24 Paris, and Paris to Nice, and we helicoptered to
25 Monte Carlo.
26 Q. Okay. Do you recall attending any other
27 events with Mr. Jackson on the trip to Monaco?
28 A. Of course, His Royal Highness Prince Albert



5554
1 hosted a reception for visiting dignitaries, and I
2 was -- he had an event -- when you go there, they
3 have an event each night for visiting dignitaries.
4 And there was only one event that Mr. Jackson
5 attended.
6 Q. And do you recall whether or not the
7 Chandler family were at that event?
8 A. They were with him.
9 Q. And that was because Michael insisted that
10 the Chandler family go?
11 A. I don't know whether he insisted whether
12 they attend or not.
13 Q. Okay.
14 A. But all of his guests were invited.
15 Q. Okay. Were there any other guests of
16 Michael Jackson that you haven't named?
17 A. No, just the Chandler family.
18 Q. Okay. Now, did you begin writing your book
19 after your employment ended?
20 A. I had made notes on certain things. Yes,
21 the actual beginning of the writing of the book
22 started after my employment ended, yes.

23 Q. And has there been an effort by you or your
24 co-writer to market the book overseas?
25 A. Well, I would imagine that the publisher
26 has.
27 Q. Has there been an attempt to market it in
28 the United States?



5555
1 A. I would imagine that the publisher has.
2 Q. Okay. And who is in charge of that issue?
3 A. My co-writer.
4 Q. Okay. Now, do you typically meet with your
5 co-writer periodically?
6 A. We talk on the phone. That's -- that's
7 perhaps one of the reasons there is some confusion,
8 because our -- he's based in New York and I'm based
9 in Los Angeles.
10 Q. Okay. And do you sort of fax or e-mail
11 manuscripts to one another?
12 A. We e-mail.
13 Q. Okay. And do you then typically correct or
14 change what you think is either inaccurate or
15 inappropriate?
16 A. Oh, I've changed millions of things that
17 were inaccurate that I didn't say.

18 Q. And how far away from having a product that
19 you think is accurate and complete are you?
20 A. I would say six to eight weeks.
21 Q. Okay. Have you come up with a date during
22 which you intend to announce the availability of the
23 book?
24 A. No.
25 Q. Okay. Do you remember in your interview on
26 April 7th, 2005, a police officer asking you about
27 whether or not there was any licking on the plane by
28 Michael, and you said, "I just don't remember and I



5556
1 would be lying to say that I did"?
2 A. Of course I recall saying that.
3 Q. And that was the truth, right?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Now, on the plane coming back, do you
6 remember where Jordie's mother June was seated?
7 A. Sure.
8 Q. Where was she seated?
9 A. We were all in first class, and on one side
10 of the rear of first class was Michael and Jordie
11 Chandler. On the total opposite side was June
12 Chandler and her daughter.
13 Q. Certainly June and her daughter were in a
14 position to observe Michael and Jordie, correct?
15 A. That is correct.
16 Q. So they were seated parallel to one another?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. Nothing that went on was hidden from
19 anybody, correct?
20 A. No.
21 Q. And where were you seated in relation --
22 A. I was seated at least two front -- two rows
23 ahead of them.

24 Q. How many times have you been contacted by
25 any representative of the sheriffs or police
26 department in this case?
27 A. Well, I was contacted prior to my
28 registration -- I mean, my being served with a



5557
1 subpoena. And at one point, a Richard Steingard, I
2 approached him about representation because he had
3 represented me before in this case, and then he came
4 back and said that he could not represent me any
5 longer. And that's when Attorney Sachs was
6 contacted. So I had been -- they attempted to serve
7 a subpoena to me, and at that time I did accept the
8 subpoena at Richard Steingard's office, and
9 following which he informed me that he could no
10 longer represent me.
11 Q. Have you ever spoken to any prosecutor for
12 the government in this case directly?
13 A. Who do you mean, the government?
14 Q. These people. The prosecutors.
15 A. Certainly. I've -- Mr. Auchincloss and
16 Steve Robel.
17 Q. When did you last meet with Mr. Auchincloss?
18 A. I met with him on Friday when I was told to
19 go home and come back.
20 Q. Okay. And did you meet with him before
21 that?
22 A. Of course. You mentioned an April date that
23 Mr. Auchincloss had me to come up.
24 Q. Okay. Was that April 7th?
25 A. I guess, sir. I don't -- I'm not good with
26 dates, so --
27 Q. You had an interview with Sergeant Steve
28 Robel, right?



5558
1 A. And Mr. Auchincloss.
2 Q. Okay. How many meetings did you have with
3 Sergeant Robel, if you know?
4 A. I only met Sergeant Robel when I was with
5 Mr. Auchincloss. I met them both at the same time.
6 Q. Okay. So when you said, "I just don't
7 remember and I would be lying to say that I did,"
8 about head licking, Mr. Auchincloss was right there,
9 right?
10 A. We were -- we were there, yes, we were --
11 the three of us were in the room.
12 Q. So he clearly heard you say that, correct?
13 A. Mr. Auchincloss was in the room with Mr.
14 Robel.
15 Q. And he tried to misquote you in court today,
16 correct?
17 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. This is
18 argumentative; improper.
19 THE COURT: Sustained.
20 MR. MESEREAU: No further questions, Your
21 Honor.
 

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
5561
19
20 RECROSS-EXAMINATION
21 BY MR. MESEREAU:
22 Q. Mr. Jones, on April 7th, you told the police
23 and Mr. Auchincloss you'd be lying if you said you
24 saw Mr. Jackson licking Mr. Chandler, right?
25 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Misstates the
26 evidence and argumentative.
27 THE COURT: Overruled.
28 You may answer. Do you want the question



5562
1 read back?
2 THE WITNESS: I would say since he -- I have
3 to say it has to be true if it came in my e-mail.
4 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: But, sir, you just told
5 the police the other day that you'd be lying if you
6 said he did that, right?
7 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Same objections.
8 THE COURT: Overruled.
9 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Right?
10 A. I -- I, again, have to say what I said. If
11 it's in my e-mail, it's true.
12 Q. But you just told the jury you don't recall
13 seeing something like that, correct?
14 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Asked and
15 answered; argumentative.
16 THE COURT: Overruled.
17 THE WITNESS: I go back with the same
18 answer. It was in my e-mail. So if it was in my
19 e-mail, I'm taking responsibility for the e-mail.
20 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Well, but you've also
21 indicated a number of the things you wrote are not
22 accurate, true?
23 A. I didn't write anything. My co-writer wrote
24 those things. But he is -- he has shown me an
25 e-mail that I wrote and sent to my co-writer.
26 Q. But, sir, you just told the jury what you
27 told the police last week, which is that you'd be
28 lying if you said you saw that, right?



5563
1 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I believe that misstates
2 the evidence.
3 THE COURT: Overruled.
4 Is that what -- he's really asking you, "Is
5 that what you told the police?" Did you tell the
6 police --
7 THE WITNESS: Yes, that is what I told the
8 police.
9 MR. MESEREAU: No further questions.
 

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
5583
10 CROSS-EXAMINATION
11 BY MR. MESEREAU:
12 Q. Good morning, Mr. Brown.
13 A. Good morning.
14 Q. How long have you known Bob Jones?
15 A. The year Princess Diana died. I think it
16 was '97.
17 Q. Okay. And approximately when did he tell
18 you he intended to write a book?
19 A. It was about January, a few months before he
20 was terminated.
21 Q. And you've been interviewed by the sheriffs
22 in this case, right?
23 A. That's correct.
24 Q. And you told the sheriffs that Bob Jones
25 told you he's broke and he needs to make some money,
26 right?
27 A. That's what --
28 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; hearsay.



5584
1 THE COURT: Sustained.
2 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Have you gone through
3 different drafts with Mr. Jones?
4 A. Yes, I have.
5 Q. On the issue of head licking, did Mr. Jones
6 tell you at one point he had to make money on this
7 book because he had financial problems?
8 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Hearsay;
9 argumentative.
10 THE COURT: Overruled.
11 You may answer.
12 THE WITNESS: He didn't -- Mr. Mesereau, he
13 didn't tell me that in relation to the head licking.
14 That never came up in discussions of money.
15 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: But he told you he's broke
16 and has to get paid for this book, correct?
17 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Hearsay;
18 argumentative.
19 THE COURT: Overruled.
20 You may answer.
21 THE WITNESS: When we first started the book,
22 he said he needs the money. He was just fired.
23 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: And he said he was broke,
24 right?
25 A. Yes. That's correct.
26 Q. You told the police you said he was broke,
27 right?
28 A. That's correct.



5585
1 Q. Okay. Now, how did -- how did the -- let me
2 rephrase that.
3 Obviously at some point you met with Bob
4 Jones about writing a book, correct?
5 A. That's correct.
6 Q. And where did you meet with him?
7 A. Well, as I said earlier, he first approached
8 me here at the court, back during the arraignment.
9 Q. And did he tell you then he wanted to write
10 something?
11 A. That's correct.
12 Q. And that's before he --
13 A. That's before his termination.
14 Q. Okay. And how long before his termination
15 was that, do you think?
16 A. Well, it was January, so -- the termination
17 was in June. So four, five months.
18 Q. And did he tell you he was doing it
19 secretly?
20 A. Well, he didn't say secretly, but he said --
21 obviously any process with a book, you don't want
22 everyone to know this is what you are doing.
23 I did, however, myself, tell members of the
24 family, to get their thoughts on it, because that
25 was my concern, what their thoughts may be with me
26 doing a book with Bob Jones with -- chiefly it had
27 to be about Michael Jackson.
28 Q. Okay. Now, did Mr. Jones tell you he was



5586
1 talking to anyone from the sheriff's department?
2 A. Not at that time, no.
3 Q. When did you first learn that he had spoken
4 to anyone from the sheriff's department?
5 A. I believe they first contacted him in
6 December of last year.
7 Q. And based on the prosecutor's questions to
8 you, you must have learned at some point that Bob
9 Jones was saying he couldn't really remember seeing
10 any head licking, right?
11 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; hearsay.
12 THE COURT: I'm sorry, I can't read the --
13 THE REPORTER: "Learned" instead of
14 "render."
15 THE COURT: All right. The objection is
16 Overruled.
17 You may answer.
18 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat it, sir?
19 MR. MESEREAU: I'll have it read back. May
20 it be read back, Your Honor?
21 THE COURT: Yes.
22 (Record read.)
23 THE WITNESS: Oh, I wouldn't say it was
24 based on the prosecutor's -- that. I think it was
25 simply when I spoke with him, he got a little
26 nervous about that particular vein. I think he
27 realized that it was going to become a part of this
28 --



5587
1 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Well, did you and Mr.
2 Jones discuss the fact that the Arvizos went to
3 Larry Feldman, the same lawyer who represented the
4 Chandlers?
5 A. The --
6 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Relevance;
7 beyond the scope; and argumentative.
8 THE COURT: Sustained.
9 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Has the name Larry Feldman
10 come up in the book you're writing?
11 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Same objection.
12 THE COURT: Overruled.
13 You may answer.
14 THE WITNESS: Not by name, but certainly by
15 title and by inference. Bob did say, based on his
16 notes back in --
17 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Well, just -- you just
18 have to answer the question, okay? I'll get into
19 that --
20 A. Okay.
21 Q. -- okay?
22 Does the book concern this case in any
23 respect?
24 A. I would think in some respects.
25 Q. And is it your plan to market the book while
26 this trial is going on?
27 A. Well, it all depends on when it's finished.
28 Q. Has he ever talked to you about when he



5588
1 plans to complete the book?
2 A. Well, I have a lot of say in that, so we've
3 talked about that, and we've always said we don't
4 want it to be a rush job, and a lot of people want
5 it to be a rush job. The publisher wants it to be a
6 rush job.
7 Q. The publisher wants it to be a rough job --
8 A. Rush job.
9 Q. -- rush job because you can sell it better
10 while the trial is going on, right?
11 A. Obviously, if it comes out now, it would
12 probably pique some interest because it's Bob Jones,
13 who, you know, has worked for Michael for so long,
14 and it's Michael.
15 Q. Now, have you discussed the amount of money
16 he might make on the book?
17 A. No, you know, we -- we've been made promises
18 in the past. We don't listen to that. We don't
19 even speculate on what can be made.
20 Personally, I just enjoy writing, so, you
21 know, the money aspect -- I think I do pretty well.
22 It's not a big deal to me.
23 Q. Do you remember you were interviewed by a
24 Santa Barbara sheriff on December 7th, 2004?
25 A. Around about, yeah.
26 Q. And you were approached by Sergeant Robel,
27 right?
28 A. Uh-huh. Yes, that's correct. I'm sorry.



5589
1 Q. And the purpose of the interview was to talk
2 to you about this alleged head-licking event, right?
3 A. I'm not sure if that was the purpose of the
4 interview. We talked about various things back in
5 December, but I'm not sure that was the purpose of
6 it.
7 Q. And do you remember Sergeant Robel wanted to
8 know why you had said that Mr. Jones told you he saw
9 Michael Jackson kiss Jordie, not lick his head?
10 A. Well, that's not exactly what -- that I
11 remember Sergeant Robel putting to me. There was a
12 question another investigator had had about whether
13 I said he -- Bob said he licked or kissed him, and
14 he wanted me to clarify that.
15 Q. And you had told the investigator that based
16 on your discussions with Bob Jones, he had said that
17 Michael Jackson kissed Jordie one time, didn't lick
18 his head, right?
19 A. No, I didn't say that.
20 Q. Do you remember you apologized?
21 A. No, no. What happened -- I apologized if it
22 was confused. But what happened was, I think the
23 investigator had misunderstood and that's what he
24 was calling to clarify. That's one of the reasons
25 why he called, to clarify exactly what I said. He
26 said he didn't remember if I said "licking" or
27 "kissing."
28 Q. Let me ask you if this is correct.



5590
1 A. Sure.
2 Q. "Brown apologized for the mistake. Said he
3 had not realized that he told me he was kissing as
4 opposed to licking." Does that sound accurate to
5 you?
6 A. It's probably accurate. But again, as I'm
7 explaining to you, I explained to Sergeant Robel
8 when he asked the question, when he asked me about
9 that, I had told the other investigator, I think it
10 was Zelis, I'm -- I'm not sure, but I think it was
11 Paul Zelis, the investigator's name, and I think he
12 was the one who had actually made the mistake or --
13 I won't even say "mistake." He wanted to clarify,
14 is that what I said.
15 Q. Why did you apologize to him?
16 A. Well, I apologized for being polite. I
17 mean, it's just a polite thing to do, you know. If
18 I was wrong, I have no problems apologizing.
19 Q. Now, you're aware that Mr. Jones has
20 indicated he doesn't remember head licking and has
21 said he'd be lying to say that he did. Are you
22 aware of that?
23 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; misstates the
24 evidence.
25 THE COURT: Sustained.
26 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: You're in the process of
27 writing the section of the book that deals with this
28 trip to Monaco, aren't you?



5591
1 A. No. No, we're long since past that.
2 Q. Well, Mr. Jones has indicated that he has
3 not approved --
4 A. Everything that has --
5 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Argumentative;
6 hearsay as to what Mr. Jones said; and misstates the
7 evidence.
8 THE COURT: It's an incomplete question, too.
9 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Mr. Jones has final
10 approval over what's in that book, doesn't he?
11 A. Absolutely.
12 Q. Would you agree that the more sensational
13 the book, the better the chance of making money on
14 it?
15 A. Well, obviously. I mean, we've been told
16 things that nothing surprises them about Michael
17 Jackson, so -- but it's not our intentions to write
18 a book of scandal, if that's what you're inferring.
19 It's certainly not mine, and I have to write it.
20 And I have people in his family who I happen to love
21 very much who I'm not going to disappoint.
22 Q. They're not getting any money from the book,
23 are they?
24 A. The family?
25 Q. Yes.
26 A. Why should they?
27 Q. They're not getting any money from the book,
28 are they?



5592
1 A. I'm sorry to respond in that way. No.
2 Q. The one who is going to make money is Bob
3 Jones, who's broke, right?
4 A. We both will.
5 Q. You're aware that Bob Jones was very upset
6 when he was terminated, aren't you?
7 A. You know what? To be honest with you, he
8 wasn't upset that he was terminated. He was upset
9 in which the way Randy terminated him.
10 Q. I'm not sure what that means.
11 A. Well, Bob had --
12 Q. Referring to Randy Jackson, right?
13 A. Randy Jackson, I'm sorry.
14 Bob had felt he'd been loyal to Michael for
15 basically half of Michael's life, or most of
16 Michael's life, I should say. And to get fired by a
17 messenger, you know, I felt bad, too. In fact, I
18 had spoke to someone in Michael's family about that.
19 I said, "That's horrible."
20 But he was just upset in the method. He
21 knew that eventually his time was going to be up
22 just like everyone else's.
23 Q. In the draft that you and Mr. Jones have
24 written, Mr. Jones says on at least two occasions
25 that he's never seen Michael Jackson act
26 inappropriately with children, right?
27 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; hearsay.
28 THE COURT: Overruled.



5593
1 You may answer.
2 THE WITNESS: Well, if it was the exact --
3 well, I don't remember the exact wording, but to say
4 that he saw him molest anybody, no, it does not say
5 he saw him molest anybody.
6 MR. MESEREAU: I have no further questions,
7 Your Honor.
 

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
5595
8 RECROSS-EXAMINATION
9 BY MR. MESEREAU:
10 Q. Mr. Brown, what I think the prosecutor just
11 elicited is the following: When he was broke, he
12 said there was licking. And when he didn't have
13 financial problems, he said there wasn't any, right?
14 A. Well, if that's how you --
15 Q. Right?
16 A. -- break it down, yeah, I guess.
17 MR. MESEREAU: Thank you.
18 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: No further questions.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. You may step down.
 

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
5 Q. Now, on the plane coming back, do you
6 remember where Jordie's mother June was seated?
7 A. Sure.
8 Q. Where was she seated?
9 A. We were all in first class, and on one side
10 of the rear of first class was Michael and Jordie
11 Chandler. On the total opposite side was June
12 Chandler and her daughter.
13 Q. Certainly June and her daughter were in a
14 position to observe Michael and Jordie, correct?
15 A. That is correct.
16 Q. So they were seated parallel to one another?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. Nothing that went on was hidden from
19 anybody, correct?
20 A. No.
21 Q. And where were you seated in relation --
22 A. I was seated at least two front -- two rows
23 ahead of them.

Now the obvious question is how in hell does he see any "head licking" if he's seated two rows in front of Mike? His back to the the family. The mother and sister were right across from them and didn't see what Jones miraculously saw. I guess he got eyes in the back of his head....lying a$$hole. Ridiculous.
 

sistahlamb

New member
Damn right Whisper!!!!

That bastard....I can't believe the media takes every word that comes out of his mouth as gosipel. Many people are so weak minded.
 
Top