Michael Jackson's Kougra
New member
Melville is so getting on my nerves...I want him to make a desistion and soon.
well if the defense didnt bring it up how would he know? ITs not like these ppl actually research.Originally posted by whisper
There's been a lot. Fingst just doesn't know Sneddon's record. One of the big ones pending right now in federal court is the Gary Dunlap case. He's suing this DA's office for $10M for conspiracy, prosecutorial misconduct, violation of civil rights, etc.
You can hear Dunlaps extensive interview here:
http://forums.mjeol.com/showthread.php?t=518
Well unless Fingst is actually inside the courtroom, he may not know what the defense brought up or didn't bring up. And again, this info is only as good as the people reporting it. So if their notes are lacking in info, we won't hear about it unless someone else reports it.Originally posted by dangerous
well if the defense didnt bring it up how would he know? ITs not like these ppl actually research.
I'm gonna sound completely dumb and ask the same thing cos I can't grasp it. By the sound of it it's not good, right?Originally posted by mjlovergurl
is this tape good or bad for micheal's sake? im confused! lol
true, i hope his notes are just crap. Which is more probably the case/Well unless Fingst is actually inside the courtroom, he may not know what the defense brought up or didn't bring up. And again, this info is only as good as the people reporting it. So if their notes are lacking in info, we won't hear about it unless someone else reports it
Okay I can understand that but you also typed this Ashley...Originally posted by dangerous
The tape is good, thats why the defense handed it over so carelessly. Its like "Here, you want it, take it, but ur not gonna like it."
Originally posted by dangerous+-->QUOTE (dangerous)So the defense, for their own reasons, (they weren’t compelled to or anything) gave them a copy of the tape2 and now the prosecution wants to know where it came from, saying that it could possibly be the omission of one of the UNINDICTED coconspirators admitting to false imprison, extort, bla bla blah[/b]
Ahhh ok I get it! Thanks so much Ashley! :rose: Where would I be without you? :laughOriginally posted by dangerous
LOL!
The prosecution are using that reasoning (the second quote) to compel the defense to hand over the information regarding where that tape came from. They really really want to know, mainly because.... (insert whispers quote)
Prosecutors are trying to put their spin on it. That's all. Something tells me she may have been caught on tape saying some very incriminating things.Originally posted by Tiger Lilly
Okay I can understand that but you also typed this Ashley...
How is that good?
Then whisper says this...
Sorry if I sound dumb, don't reply to me if you don't want. I'm confusing myself with my drivvel. :laugh
LOL nothing new there then. Thank you whisper! :rose:Originally posted by whisper
Prosecutors are trying to put their spin on it. That's all. Something tells me she may have been caught on tape saying some very incriminating things.
Prosecutors, as they have done before, are trying to put a negative spin on it and are trying to get around it. Any type of inciminating info against this accusing family automatically draws accusations from prosecutors against the person who got the incriminating info. That's their game plan: accusing everyone of breaking the law who has solid evidence against the accusing family.
I think that's to be discussed tomorrow. We really aren't getting much of any information reported.Originally posted by mixahl
What about the rest of the issues Mel would decide on today (bail; prosecution's raid of the place of Michael's assistant)..? Any news on these?