:bump
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Official Jan 28 2005 Hearing
- Thread starter whisperAdmin
- Start date
Stan Goldman of all people, actually saying on Fox today, after being in there, that the prosecution doesn't want the Bashir "documentary" in as consiousness of guilt or even for it's "fact" (or lackthereof) basis. He says Sneddon wanted it in to show why team Jackson allegedly "panicked" and decided to launch this prosecution-alleged "conspiracy". It's that kind of detail that is totally missing from these drive-by reports.
Here's Stan Goldman's comments:
http://site.mjeol.com/modules/mydownloads/...p?cid=9&lid=320
Here's Stan Goldman's comments:
http://site.mjeol.com/modules/mydownloads/...p?cid=9&lid=320
Cristine87
New member
^^OMG, so he made it worse for himself by doing something that's actually incriminating? I don't understand people's reasoning!
marialovesmjj
New member
Wow. That's all I can really think of to say.
****Maria****
****Maria****
mjfan4ever2009
New member
The European version of the Martin Bashir documentary differs because the American version, from what I understand, had been edited down.
HeavenSent
New member
That some whacked logic. Michael was trying to do damage control because of people's reactions--He's a public figure! It's what public figures do! Please, Sneddon is giving himself too much credit. This damage control would have happened ever if the prosecution never existed. It wasn't about Michael committing a crime and then going "ooops, I'mma look bad for the prosecution, lemme do something to fix it."Originally posted by whisper
. He says Sneddon wanted it in to show why team Jackson allegedly "panicked" and decided to launch this prosecution-alleged "conspiracy". It's that kind of detail that is totally missing from these drive-by reports.
Here's Stan Goldman's comments:
http://site.mjeol.com/modules/mydownloads/...p?cid=9&lid=320
SpecialJanet25
New member
Originally posted by dangerous
that still doesnt explain why he would molest G after that damaging documentary.
Exactly!
A
Anonymous
Guest
Originally posted by HeavenSent
That some whacked logic. Michael was trying to do damage control because of people's reactions--He's a public figure! It's what public figures do! Please, Sneddon is giving himself too much credit. This damage control would have happened ever if the prosecution never existed. It wasn't about Michael committing a crime and then going "ooops, I'mma look bad for the prosecution, lemme do something to fix it."
Exactly. Wow..a celebrity want to do clean-up after a bad PR move. Conspiracy!
Please.