official thread
Official Jan 28 2005 Hearing
- Thread starter whisperAdmin
- Start date
Mikey's Angel
New member
Is Michael going to attend???
No news just yet. No Michael will not attend today.
Dude for Fox outside the courtroom just said the lawyers arrived about 5 minutes ago (before his live report).
A.Beautiful.Mind
New member
Thanks Whisper 
Do you know what will be challenged into todays hearing?
~Jamie~
Do you know what will be challenged into todays hearing?
~Jamie~
InspirationMoonwalks
New member
Originally posted by Baby girl
What about 31st, what time is it? I have to go there but I don't know the time? Please someone tell me!!!
How many of you will be going?
I'll be there
Last I heard, court will be held from about 8:30 am to 2:30 pm (California time)See 'ya there!
opcornA.Beautiful.Mind
New member
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Evidence Code § 402 Issues
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Admission of Expert Testimony on “Battered Women’s Syndrome”
Plaintiff’s Motion for Admission of Martin Bashir’s Documentary “Living with Michael Jackson” as Evidence of Defendant’s Motive etc.
Plaintiff’s Request to Admit Seized Evidence of Erotic Materials to Demonstrate Defendant’s Intent, etc.
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances
Motion for Order Directing that Testimony of Child Witnesses be Closed to the Public
Motion for an Order Allowing Individual Sequestered Voir Dire of Prospective Jurors
Motion for an Order That the District Attorney Not Be Allowed to Tell the Jury that He Represents “The People” in a Manner that Implies that He Represents the Jury Against the Defendant etc
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Limit Uncharged Conspirator Hearsay
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Reference to Materials as Pornographic
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Civil Settlement Amounts
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Books, Magazines, Photographs, etc. of Disrobed Individuals
Motion in Limine to Exclude Fourteen Items of Irrelevant Evidence
Application for Order that the Defense Response to the DA’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances, Dated January 21, 2005, Be Withdrawn
Motion for Protective Order Precluding Martin Bashir from Being Required to Testify and For Clarification that “Gag” Order Does Not Apply to Martin Bashir
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Evidence Code § 402 Issues, and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Admission of Expert Testimony on “Battered Women’s Syndrome” and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Motion for Admission of Martin Bashir’s Documentary etc. and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Request to Admit Seized Evidence of Erotic Materials to Demonstrate Defendant’s Intent, etc. and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Defense Opposition to Motion for Order Directing that Testimony of Child Witnesses be Closed to the Public and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Opposition to Motion for an Order Allowing Individual Sequestered Voir Dire of Prospective Jurors and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Limit Uncharged Conspirator Hearsay and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Reference to Materials as Pornographic and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Civil Settlement Amounts and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Books, Magazines, Photographs, etc. of Disrobed Individuals and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Motion in Limine to Exclude Fourteen Items of Irrelevant Evidence and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Ex Parte Application for an Order that Mr. Jackson be Allowed to Make a Public Statement Regarding Information Leaked to the Media
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Response to Martin Bashir’s Motion for Protective Order Precluding Him from Being Required to Testify as Witness in this Case
Motion to Seal Ex Parte Application for an Order That the Defense Response to the District Attorney’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances Dated January 21, 2005 Be Withdrawn
JANUARY 28, 2005 CRIMINAL CALENDAR
~Jamie~
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Admission of Expert Testimony on “Battered Women’s Syndrome”
Plaintiff’s Motion for Admission of Martin Bashir’s Documentary “Living with Michael Jackson” as Evidence of Defendant’s Motive etc.
Plaintiff’s Request to Admit Seized Evidence of Erotic Materials to Demonstrate Defendant’s Intent, etc.
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances
Motion for Order Directing that Testimony of Child Witnesses be Closed to the Public
Motion for an Order Allowing Individual Sequestered Voir Dire of Prospective Jurors
Motion for an Order That the District Attorney Not Be Allowed to Tell the Jury that He Represents “The People” in a Manner that Implies that He Represents the Jury Against the Defendant etc
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Limit Uncharged Conspirator Hearsay
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Reference to Materials as Pornographic
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Civil Settlement Amounts
Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Books, Magazines, Photographs, etc. of Disrobed Individuals
Motion in Limine to Exclude Fourteen Items of Irrelevant Evidence
Application for Order that the Defense Response to the DA’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances, Dated January 21, 2005, Be Withdrawn
Motion for Protective Order Precluding Martin Bashir from Being Required to Testify and For Clarification that “Gag” Order Does Not Apply to Martin Bashir
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Evidence Code § 402 Issues, and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine re: Admission of Expert Testimony on “Battered Women’s Syndrome” and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Motion for Admission of Martin Bashir’s Documentary etc. and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Request to Admit Seized Evidence of Erotic Materials to Demonstrate Defendant’s Intent, etc. and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Defense Opposition to Motion for Order Directing that Testimony of Child Witnesses be Closed to the Public and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Opposition to Motion for an Order Allowing Individual Sequestered Voir Dire of Prospective Jurors and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Limit Uncharged Conspirator Hearsay and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Reference to Materials as Pornographic and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Civil Settlement Amounts and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Books, Magazines, Photographs, etc. of Disrobed Individuals and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Motion in Limine to Exclude Fourteen Items of Irrelevant Evidence and Opposition and Reply thereto if sealing requested
Motion to Seal Ex Parte Application for an Order that Mr. Jackson be Allowed to Make a Public Statement Regarding Information Leaked to the Media
Motion to Seal Plaintiff’s Response to Martin Bashir’s Motion for Protective Order Precluding Him from Being Required to Testify as Witness in this Case
Motion to Seal Ex Parte Application for an Order That the Defense Response to the District Attorney’s Motion in Limine for Admission of Expert Testimony on Defendant’s Finances Dated January 21, 2005 Be Withdrawn
JANUARY 28, 2005 CRIMINAL CALENDAR
~Jamie~
*Judge ruled that the jury can see the European version of the documentary. Will "defer" a decision on a defense request on whether or not to show Jackson's footage shot by his own photographer during the time Bashir was filming the doc.
*Says prosecutors can show the jury "adult" material seized from Neverland, but can't call it "pornography" "obsecene" or "erotic"
*Says prosecutors can show the jury "adult" material seized from Neverland, but can't call it "pornography" "obsecene" or "erotic"
how different is that from the one shown in the US?
Whats to defer? I dont see why he cant show it? What kind of conflict does showing that bring? His footage was also shown on TV, so why cant it be seen in court??? And how can you show a privatley produced documentary? How can the judge be sure the ppl who conducted the interview and edited material are without bias?????
danaluvsmj
New member
hmm I like what I hear so far, but I'm a little iffy about the documentary footage.
Early reports say the judge also ruled the accuser can't be referred to a "victim" until closing statements for prosecutors.
A.Beautiful.Mind
New member
Yeah, and that decision isn't strictly satisfying. Like, Ash said.. Why suspend his ruling on the motion. If the prosecutors are approved on their motion for something which associate's to the defense's request, then it should be permited.
~Jamie~
From CNN's Miguel Marquez
*Stuff taken from raid in 1993 is out
*Accuser MUST testify in open court
*Stuff taken from raid in 1993 is out
*Accuser MUST testify in open court
Off_the_wall
New member
Good to hear!!
A.Beautiful.Mind
New member
Eventually, something which Melville has ruled that has subsequently acted in the favour of the defense. The prosecuting side isn't going to be happy about the ruling against the introduction of the material from the 1993 raid, as most of their case is based on the foundations from the past investigation.
~Jamie~