Dialdancer
New member
Repost from TwitLonger:
Please share, Twitter, FB and posts.
Helena of Vindicate Michael has just put together something more to debunk the 93 allegation.
We all knew JC did not see MJ. He would have found an uncircumcised member so much more different from his own as he was Jewish born. I know when I first saw one then later the other, I had to ask what was up.
We know there were no operations to "cover up" because Michael's skin would not have healed without scarring noticeable to the observers and court appointed physician present at the time. None because it would have been recorded in autopsy(s). And because there was no need to do so.
JC told of a "spot", its location and coloration. Sneddon went along with JC, then had to contradict AFTER seeing photos. (In 2011 when asked about this Dimond says JC was just confused...uh huh)
But no where in the filed complaint (which is one of the most filthiest pieces of writing I've had the misfortune to read) or any Dimond story does it talk of these markings. None of the made up victims nor the hired help who helped themselves to MJ property then tried to help themselves to his bank account for Sneddon and now for......????
Be interesting to see what WR had his attorney put down in his complaint, BEFORE he changes his story AGAIN? Before he files another 50 law suits?
Please share, Twitter, FB and posts.
Helena of Vindicate Michael has just put together something more to debunk the 93 allegation.
We all knew JC did not see MJ. He would have found an uncircumcised member so much more different from his own as he was Jewish born. I know when I first saw one then later the other, I had to ask what was up.
We know there were no operations to "cover up" because Michael's skin would not have healed without scarring noticeable to the observers and court appointed physician present at the time. None because it would have been recorded in autopsy(s). And because there was no need to do so.
JC told of a "spot", its location and coloration. Sneddon went along with JC, then had to contradict AFTER seeing photos. (In 2011 when asked about this Dimond says JC was just confused...uh huh)
But no where in the filed complaint (which is one of the most filthiest pieces of writing I've had the misfortune to read) or any Dimond story does it talk of these markings. None of the made up victims nor the hired help who helped themselves to MJ property then tried to help themselves to his bank account for Sneddon and now for......????
Be interesting to see what WR had his attorney put down in his complaint, BEFORE he changes his story AGAIN? Before he files another 50 law suits?