uranusbluedanger1
New member
I felt like randomly popping in to read a little and then I ended up having a few thoughts to share...
Reafu, (sorry, this school computer is being weird and won't let me click quote) I was reading your comments and I immediately began to think of how easy it is to sometimes defend actions and ideas of people we feel like we have a connection to, etc, and I began to evaluate my own thoughts... Really, I think there is a difference between recreating the past and trying to create a past. When you play video games, when I watch Disney movies and play swordfight with my cousin, I'm reliving something that happened... I'm recreating an emotion that brings me comfort. But by no means am I trying to create a childhood. I had one, I had a past, and that past helped to shape my identity. The way I see it, the truth is sad, and that is that not having a childhood does not inherently mean someone didn't have a past, but this, I feel from seeing how much importance Michael gave to the idea of childhood, might have meant that Michael felt his identity was incomplete. He was missing something, and it's the eternal question of the what if: would I like myself better, would I have more friends, would I... if I had had it... Just think guys. How many of you are still tight frieds with your childish crue. *raises hand* I am. These people were my friends before a lot of things... Maybe he really thought that he could have had better friends, he could have felt better about things, who knows... So, while I get your point. I don't see it the same way. And as far as feeling more comfortable with children? I agree, I feel more comfortable with people under and above my age group or with other gifted kids. It's a preference. What does worry me is when a person makes a statement repeatedly that they'd rather stop living if children did not exist... and you know why? It speaks of a lack of resistence, which can come from many things. Because Michael is such a resilient person, that quote, and it being repeated over and over again, goes against his character... it raises red flags.
Anyway, the more I think about people around him and people asking him to seek professional help, the more I immediately begin to think of cognitive dissonance. Any psychology majors or people interested i psychology out there? It refers to an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding contradictory ideas. The "ideas" or "cognitions" in question may include attitudes and beliefs, the awareness of one's behavior, and facts. "The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, or by justifying or rationalizing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors." This is actually also used in political science to explain irrational actions by heads of state, etc. Why is it that even though people see a problem, they don't act on it? I think it would be harsh to judge the family because that is to assume they saw the problem directly, recognized it and knew how to deal with it. Not all people know how to any of the three above, and sometimes recognition is the most important. So, what if they saw it, but only in a glimpse, and in an act of cognitive dissonance, because the view went again a resilient, strong Michael, against the idea of an innocent, isolated kind man, whatever idea they had of him.... they probably simply justified it and the uncomfortable feeling of the two differing thoughts left. That's what I thought of while reading Reafu's post... really, we can find many explanations for thngs. And maybe even now we might be reading too much into it. But just think how difficult it might be to recognize these things. Hindsight bias does the person who needed help no good at all... but it feels almost shameful to point the finger at the family, at those close to him, because I can't assume they really saw it and recognized it.
Anyway, just bringing in a few psychology terms and adding my ideas. Thanks everyone for providing such amazing responses... I'll certainly be thinking about this...
Reafu, (sorry, this school computer is being weird and won't let me click quote) I was reading your comments and I immediately began to think of how easy it is to sometimes defend actions and ideas of people we feel like we have a connection to, etc, and I began to evaluate my own thoughts... Really, I think there is a difference between recreating the past and trying to create a past. When you play video games, when I watch Disney movies and play swordfight with my cousin, I'm reliving something that happened... I'm recreating an emotion that brings me comfort. But by no means am I trying to create a childhood. I had one, I had a past, and that past helped to shape my identity. The way I see it, the truth is sad, and that is that not having a childhood does not inherently mean someone didn't have a past, but this, I feel from seeing how much importance Michael gave to the idea of childhood, might have meant that Michael felt his identity was incomplete. He was missing something, and it's the eternal question of the what if: would I like myself better, would I have more friends, would I... if I had had it... Just think guys. How many of you are still tight frieds with your childish crue. *raises hand* I am. These people were my friends before a lot of things... Maybe he really thought that he could have had better friends, he could have felt better about things, who knows... So, while I get your point. I don't see it the same way. And as far as feeling more comfortable with children? I agree, I feel more comfortable with people under and above my age group or with other gifted kids. It's a preference. What does worry me is when a person makes a statement repeatedly that they'd rather stop living if children did not exist... and you know why? It speaks of a lack of resistence, which can come from many things. Because Michael is such a resilient person, that quote, and it being repeated over and over again, goes against his character... it raises red flags.
Anyway, the more I think about people around him and people asking him to seek professional help, the more I immediately begin to think of cognitive dissonance. Any psychology majors or people interested i psychology out there? It refers to an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding contradictory ideas. The "ideas" or "cognitions" in question may include attitudes and beliefs, the awareness of one's behavior, and facts. "The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, or by justifying or rationalizing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors." This is actually also used in political science to explain irrational actions by heads of state, etc. Why is it that even though people see a problem, they don't act on it? I think it would be harsh to judge the family because that is to assume they saw the problem directly, recognized it and knew how to deal with it. Not all people know how to any of the three above, and sometimes recognition is the most important. So, what if they saw it, but only in a glimpse, and in an act of cognitive dissonance, because the view went again a resilient, strong Michael, against the idea of an innocent, isolated kind man, whatever idea they had of him.... they probably simply justified it and the uncomfortable feeling of the two differing thoughts left. That's what I thought of while reading Reafu's post... really, we can find many explanations for thngs. And maybe even now we might be reading too much into it. But just think how difficult it might be to recognize these things. Hindsight bias does the person who needed help no good at all... but it feels almost shameful to point the finger at the family, at those close to him, because I can't assume they really saw it and recognized it.
Anyway, just bringing in a few psychology terms and adding my ideas. Thanks everyone for providing such amazing responses... I'll certainly be thinking about this...