Jackson prosecutor has courtroom showdown (Aug 16 2004)

whisperAdmin

Administrator
Staff member
Jackson prosecutor has courtroom showdown


By Norma Meyer
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

6:49 p.m. August 16, 2004


Associated Press

SANTA MARIA — In a high-drama showdown, Michael Jackson, dressed with his family members in symbolic good-guy white, watched Monday as his attorney grilled the combative top prosecutor who has pursued the singer in two child molestation cases over 11 years.

Although his five siblings could be heard snickering at times, Jackson, who arrived at the courthouse in a customized gold double-decker bus, sat virtually motionless during the three-hour questioning of Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon. Jackson wrote a song about Sneddon calling him "a cold man" after the prosecutor unsuccessfully sought child molestation charges against him in 1993.

The stakes in this ongoing pre-trial hearing are big. Defense lawyers claim Sneddon violated Jackson's attorney-client privilege when detectives raided the office of a Beverly Hills investigator who worked for the pop star's former attorney, Mark Geragos. If the judge rules that the evidence was illegally seized and throws it out, the prosecution's child-molestation case could be crippled.

As attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr. tried to chip away at Sneddon's testimony, the hard-nosed veteran prosecutor — who has earned the nickname "Mad Dog" from colleagues — became testy. Sneddon refused to admit he was suspicious that private investigator Bradley Miller was working for Geragos, even though he acknowledged seeing letters with both men's names involving the mother of Jackson's young accuser. Often, he refused to give an inch — he would not concede, for example, that police "read documents" they came across during the search that led to a storage locker in Miller's name; instead, he asserted they "found information" at the search that tipped them off.

"Mr. Sneddon, I'm going to ask you not to spar with the attorney," Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville admonished at one point.

Sneddon also raised courtroom eyebrows when he explained why he admitted to the defense team, in a phone conversation last month, that he knew about the relationship between Miller and Geragos before the November 2003 search and would testify under oath about it. Sneddon called the defense the next day and retracted his statement.


During questioning by one of his own prosecutors Monday, Sneddon blamed the error on fatigue from driving since 5 a.m. and anger over the fact that his assistants were late preparing a court brief in the case. He said he mistakenly "transposed" the relationship between Geragos and Jackson to Geragos and Miller. "It was a mistake born of being upset and being angry," he said.

Outside court, Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson said Sneddon was "playing the role of clueless prosecutor" who may have been confused but did nothing intentionally illegal. While a jury might roll their eyes at his testimony, she said a judge could be more inclined to find Sneddon's explanation plausible.

Jackson arrived with his family to the cheers of about 200 fans, who pressed up against a chain-link fence to get a glimpse of him flanked by sisters LaToya and Janet and flashing the victory sign with bandaged fingers. Among the crowd were two young brothers who held up a misspelled handmade sign that read: "If Micheal Jackson's Peter Pan Then Tom Sneddon Is Captain Hook."

Later, under a bodyguard's black umbrella, Jackson returned to eat lunch on the bus, which was parked in the courthouse lot and surrounded by sheriff's deputies. Once, he got off the bus and waved to the crowds.

As soon as Sneddon finished testifying in mid-afternoon, Jackson and his family reboarded the luxury coach as fans chanted "Get off the bus!" The bus left with a police escort. More witnesses are expected to testify today in the evidence hearing, which could last several days. WAGNER-CNS-SD-08-16-04

:nav Source: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/2...cnsjackson.html
 

t1obaggage

New member
"During questioning by one of his own prosecutors Monday, Sneddon blamed the error on fatigue from driving since 5 a.m. and anger over the fact that his assistants were late preparing a court brief in the case. He said he mistakenly "transposed" the relationship between Geragos and Jackson to Geragos and Miller. "It was a mistake born of being upset and being angry," he said."

The issue here isn't a relationship between Geragos and Jackson. He OBVIOUSLY knew Geragos was working for Jackson. They didn't even get a search warrant for anything involving Geragos (besides Miller's office). That would just be obviously wrong and stupid. What would he need to testify in court for about a relationship between Geragos and Jackson? I think this explanation is bull crap, just another example of making up lame excuses to fill up holes in the story.

Fatigue from driving and anger that his associates were late in filing documents? He makes it sound as if he contacts the defense regularly, when in fact he rarely contacts them and when he does so it's only when he has to. As far as the lateness, it hasn't been a problem to him that they are so late in turning over evidence and search warrant stuff, has it?

If he's such a "veteran prosecutor," he never would have made a mistake that stupid if he had gone so far to cover up an illegal search of Miller's office.

Tom Sneddon is full of bull crap, and I'm glad he's finally on the witness stand so Mesereau can uncover it.
 

dangerous

New member
Originally posted by t1obaggage
The issue here isn't a relationship between Geragos and Jackson. He OBVIOUSLY knew Geragos was working for Jackson. They didn't even get a search warrant for anything involving Geragos (besides Miller's office). That would just be obviously wrong and stupid. What would he need to testify in court for about a relationship between Geragos and Jackson? I think this explanation is bull crap, just another example of making up lame excuses to fill up holes in the story.

Exactly! Such an obvious atttempt to cover the wool over our eyes. Who signs affadavits for such legal and obvious statements??!!?!
 
Top