Crazy4MiJac
New member
In another recent thread, "I'm just going to say it," has me wondering: how do the members on this forum respond to speculation about Michael's life?
I love Michael Jackson unconditionally, for a variety of reasons that I shan't delve into at this moment... Well, let me just say that I believe the essence of his true character is made known through his music, his writings and his dedication to philanthropy. I think his good heart is unquestionably apparent to anyone who takes the effort to notice it.
I digress, though: I am keenly interested in understanding his entire life as completely as is possible, and I love throwing out ideas and possibilities to discuss with other fans. I like to look at things from all angles. I like to weigh the raw evidence, the credibility of sources, the number of corroborating stories... to try to get to the truth, whatever it may be. It's like a puzzle to me... Michael Jackson's life is the ultimate puzzle.
And - I need to say - I do not fall on my knees and worship the claims of any party, the Jackson family, or even Michael himself. No-one is fool-proof, as far as I'm concerned.
Yes, there are some things we'll never know - some things we're not meant to know - but is this not the nature of history? Will we ever know, in any concrete way, anything of history? Is not every document tainted with some degree of bias?
Yet we still sift through the masses, searching for kernels of truth... or, at least, the most probable possibility.
Your thoughts? What is generally tolerated/not-tolerated? Obviously I'm not talking about stupid crap, like "Is his nose a fake?" That's... not my point at all. :mellow:
I love Michael Jackson unconditionally, for a variety of reasons that I shan't delve into at this moment... Well, let me just say that I believe the essence of his true character is made known through his music, his writings and his dedication to philanthropy. I think his good heart is unquestionably apparent to anyone who takes the effort to notice it.
I digress, though: I am keenly interested in understanding his entire life as completely as is possible, and I love throwing out ideas and possibilities to discuss with other fans. I like to look at things from all angles. I like to weigh the raw evidence, the credibility of sources, the number of corroborating stories... to try to get to the truth, whatever it may be. It's like a puzzle to me... Michael Jackson's life is the ultimate puzzle.
And - I need to say - I do not fall on my knees and worship the claims of any party, the Jackson family, or even Michael himself. No-one is fool-proof, as far as I'm concerned.
Yes, there are some things we'll never know - some things we're not meant to know - but is this not the nature of history? Will we ever know, in any concrete way, anything of history? Is not every document tainted with some degree of bias?
Yet we still sift through the masses, searching for kernels of truth... or, at least, the most probable possibility.
Your thoughts? What is generally tolerated/not-tolerated? Obviously I'm not talking about stupid crap, like "Is his nose a fake?" That's... not my point at all. :mellow: