Off_the_wall
New member
aawww
:inlove
Originally posted by aaliyah
Originally posted by floacist
OMG!!!He is wearing snakeskin!!Carla if you EVER and I mean EVER doubt his pimpness I will show you this picture cause at this day and age if any grown man is wearing snake skin he is a PIMP plain and simple.
Aww Michael in a trench coat!!
????Mesereau, you BEST object more than that!
Originally posted by dangerous
????
Each side gets 10 vetos without stating cause. Whats does Mez objecting more do?
I love how ppl jump on the blame the defence wagon
Originally posted by dangerous
????
Each side gets 10 vetos without stating cause. Whats does Mez objecting more do?
I love how ppl jump on the blame the defence wagon
Originally posted by Purdy Young Thang
No, no, no! That wasn't a jab at the defense. T-Mez does no wrong.
I meant, they can't let Melville do that. Eliminate people off the jury for stupid reasons like that as if it were Survivor? Gah.
So unfair..
Originally posted by NevaehDreamz
<3 these pictures!
If Michael doesn't gain weight, I think I'll cry. I'm really worried!
omg omg omg omg omg HE IS SOOOOOOOOO BEAUTIFUL OMG look at that profile picture ... GOD I almost died!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by NevaehDreamz
<3 these pictures!
If Michael doesn't gain weight, I think I'll cry. I'm really worried!
Meh... let them eliminate people who have (dun dun dun) listened to Michael's music! God forbid that'll sway the trial! What else has Sneddumb got as a reason to dismiss potential jurors? He wants to get out people who are fans (lol @ one highschool dance!!) just as the defense wants out people who are linked to the DA's office. What's the big deal, we all knew that's what the pros would do. Doesn't mean we'll get an unfair jury. I actually think it's amusing the way he's gonna want to throw out anyone who's ever listen to a single track of Michael's. Good luck hunting out all those people Sned.Sorry, but some of these reasons are ridiculous! Although both sides aren't fully required to elaborate on various prospective juror dismissals, they should at least be supported by some genuine evidence of potential Bias. I mean, because a girl has previously danced to one of Michael's songs doesn't necessarily suggest that it could lead to prejudice judgment.
If the prosecutions intentions are to eliminate anyone who has previously encountered Michael's music, then they won't find a single person who will meet their criteria.. Who hasn't listened or danced to Michael's music?