A
Anonymous
Guest
Thank you judge for allowing this case.
2. Did he allow MJ to show his own footage?
2. Did he allow MJ to show his own footage?
Official Feb 25 2005 Thread
- Thread starter whisperAdmin
- Start date
Black Loafers
New member
LOL Lauren....Everything costs money..and surgery is pretty expensive..Ig u got no cash you can't get it...:laugh
frozen rose
New member
I don't know what her name is to research her!
danaluvsmj
New member
This makes me so happy! If the mother's credibility could not be questioned then that would be really messed up.
InspirationMoonwalks
New member
YES!!! 
Exposing this BITCH for who she is will play a BIG role in winning this "case". Thank GOD Mez and crew will be allowed to do that in this way!
Exposing this BITCH for who she is will play a BIG role in winning this "case". Thank GOD Mez and crew will be allowed to do that in this way!Cristine87
New member
Wow, that's great!
Off_the_wall
New member
:crackingu
Cristine87
New member
That bitch so ugly, she doesn't need cosmetic surgery, what she needs is a completely different face!
EuphoricNostalgia
New member
simple. cuz she looks like an old hag. :crackingu
A
Anonymous
Guest
She hit every branch as she fell down out of the ugly tree.
Keep_The_Faith1
New member
LMAO
frozen rose
New member
ok..I can now visisulize that old hag!!! Lmfao Jess!
betty boop 84
New member
This man is just too cute
Info from Satyagrahi at MJJF:
Two more things:
The prosecution tried to bring in that Michael said that the police had manhandled him during his arrest, as a proof of 'consciousness of guilt'. They actually said, that the defendants' fabricated allegations of injuries were evidence of a consciousness of guilt.
Melville's ruling on this: "I don't think so. This is totally irrelevant to the case at hand. Even if these allegations were false, which you can't tell me they were, then it still does not show consciousness of guilt."
Near the end of the proceedings, there was talk about re-issuing a search warrant on Michaels Bank of America statements. Sanger objected to this, saying that exactly the same warrant, safe for a few different wordings, was already issued last October (or November?), and that the court already ruled this information inadmissable then, so the defense asked for a motion to quash the new search warrant. (I'm actually not 100% sure now if this was about a search warrant or about a motion to get insight into those bank records, but you guys should be able to look that up... please do!)
Before Melville could rule on this, Auchincloss stepped in and said that this motion was filed by mistake, and to please scrap this from the records.......
this is all my contribution about yesterday's proceedings.
Two more things:
The prosecution tried to bring in that Michael said that the police had manhandled him during his arrest, as a proof of 'consciousness of guilt'. They actually said, that the defendants' fabricated allegations of injuries were evidence of a consciousness of guilt.
Melville's ruling on this: "I don't think so. This is totally irrelevant to the case at hand. Even if these allegations were false, which you can't tell me they were, then it still does not show consciousness of guilt."
Near the end of the proceedings, there was talk about re-issuing a search warrant on Michaels Bank of America statements. Sanger objected to this, saying that exactly the same warrant, safe for a few different wordings, was already issued last October (or November?), and that the court already ruled this information inadmissable then, so the defense asked for a motion to quash the new search warrant. (I'm actually not 100% sure now if this was about a search warrant or about a motion to get insight into those bank records, but you guys should be able to look that up... please do!)
Before Melville could rule on this, Auchincloss stepped in and said that this motion was filed by mistake, and to please scrap this from the records.......
this is all my contribution about yesterday's proceedings.