Look, after closing arguments is when the jury begins deliberations.
It's been said many times that when a persons innocence or guilt is so obvious, the jury can have a virdict within hours of deliberating. Maybe that could be the case in this trial but then agian, there's so much evidence that the jury needs to look over.
But the most important thing is reasonable doubt has been established in this trial.
Every one of those jurors have to believe he is guilty beond a reasonable doubt for him to be convicted. It's all or nothing in my opinion.