MystiqueX2004
New member
two questions...if Gaving had changed his story from the time of the original investigation to now, then why would the prosecution want to present this to the court? Wouldn't that hurt their case more than help it?
Originally posted by _meowme_
Well everyone is kind of lost, is it the edited verison or the whole video that's going to be shown.
Baffles my mind.Originally posted by MystiqueX2004
two questions...if Gaving had changed his story from the time of the original investigation to now, then why would the prosecution want to present this to the court? Wouldn't that hurt their case more than help it?
After they done rested their case, NOW all of a sudden they want to show Michael's privates. Hell no. I'm glad the judge exercised decency. If those pictures were a huge part of the case, Sneddon & Co. waited too late to decide they were somehow relevant.Originally posted by whisper
Prosecution wanted to introduce photographs of Jackson's genitals. The judge said NO, it's not coming in.
Hello, of course it's good. Don't you remember the disaster they were for the pros. when they were called the first time?Originally posted by got2makeitright
Do you think its good that they will be back?? Mez did he job
Originally posted by HeavenSent
Hello, of course it's good. Don't you remember the disaster they were for the pros. when they were called the first time?
Originally posted by sistahlamb
The prosecution only kept Katz on the stand for 30 minutes.
Hopefully the defence will get to pump more info out of him this time.